Turley: Trump Indictment Will Either Lay Ground to Charge Biden or Look Crafted to Avoid Having to Charge Biden

Breitbart ^ | 06/09/2023 | IAN HANCHETT

[ChicagoConservative27]

On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Jesse Watters Primetime,” Fox News Contributor and George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley stated that if the Department of Justice charges former President Donald Trump with mishandling classified information, “it’s going to make it difficult not to charge Vice President Biden with the same crime.” But if they don’t, then it’ll seem like they crafted the indictment of Trump in a way to avoid having to charge Biden.

Turley said, “[W]e have to see what’s in this indictment. There are a couple of things that we’ll be looking for: Obviously, the obstruction charge is the one that most of us have been talking about for months. That, to me, has always been the greatest threat to Donald Trump. But there’s also the question of whether they will charge possession of classified documents. That’s going to put the Department of Justice in a tough position, because if they charge possession, it’s going to make it difficult not to charge Vice President Biden with the same crime. But if they don’t charge him on that, some people may view it as an effort to avoid the necessity of a charge against the President.”

[1Old Pro]

that given the enormous evidence of wrongdoing by Biden and his family, this current dem indictment is primarily an attempt to insulate Biden.

Selective prosecution on its face, needs to be thrown out summarily.

[JimRed]

Jesse is trying his best to fill the Tucker topics, and improving as he goes. He’ll be fired...soon.

[Reily]

That’s been my thought all along. He’s looks good on TV, sounds good on TV. Will contrast well visually with the aging Trump.

What you say? He’s a disaster as a governor! Well, the Californians had a chance to recall him and they didn’t! They must like feces on their streets and street drug bazaars. Also, when has actual accomplishments in office mattered with the modern voting public?