Shasta Equal Justice Coalition reacts to racial slur at supervisors meeting

KRCR news ^ | Thu, June 1st 2023, | Claire Lane, Nazy Javid

[cuz1961]

A different community member, Nathan Blayz, an African-American Air Force veteran, was sitting in the front row at the meeting and responded to the racial slur made by public speaker, Alex Bielecki.

....

The difference in responses to these two individuals cannot be excused under cover of free speech.

It is not that the word n___ is offensive in and of itself;

rather the context,

use, and intention make it so. ...

[cuz1961]

Oh.

So,, in defense of ignoring context,,

They they ignore context.

Typical far left left extreemism.

Further related :

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4157576/posts

https://krcrtv.com/news/local/outrage-erupts-at-supervisors-meeting-after-commenter-uses-racial-slur

https://krcrtv.com/news/local/shasta-equal-justice-coalition-reacts-to-racial-slur-at-supervisors-meeting

https://krcrtv.com/news/local/shasta-county-supervisor-responds-to-to-racial-slur-used-in-tuesdays-meeting

https://krcrtv.com/news/local/shasta-countys-new-ceo-begins-this-week-responds-to-recent-controversy#

[cuz1961]

So they avoided the factual context of the remark

And made the context the context.

Bait and switch of the context

Typical urinalism.

And why do they seem so obsessed with the same name not being related ?

[cuz1961]

Does the look on this far left left extreemist in the blue recall SHIRT the look of one offended ?

[cuz1961]

So...

Let’s review
..

It’s NOT that the n word is offensive ?

[Thank You Rush]

I don’t get it - the one objecting to the remark was described as an African American. Do they have the right picture - the right guy?

[cuz1961]

And there it is

Watching krcr news this morning

Commercial for recall by far left left extreemists.

[cuz1961]

Who knows,,, I dont,, hard to tell when dealing with urinalists who per on US and tell us it’s rain
.

Maybe he’s bubba Wallace or Barak Obama african american,,, I.o.w. half.

Or maybe he just identifies as african American.

Or maybe he’s just real light skined.

My das, who is dark olive skinned, who had a ‘ perm’ and had just came back from a week of summer sailing the san juan islands, was mistaken for an African American.

Just goes to illustrate melatonin / skin tone is a pee poor way to judge people.

[Captain Rhino]

Man on the left in Post 3 is the N-word offender.

Man on the right is the black Air Force veteran who objected and was ordered to leave. Obviously. very light skinned.

According to the linked article, the N-word user was permitted to stay and later returned to the public speaker’s podium and give “the finger” to the veteran.

[cuz1961]

Ok, on the outro of the news when this was again brought up, the man expelled was not described as african american, but just as

the man offended.

Looks like maybe the far left left extreemist urinalists may have been mistaken in their previous ‘ news’ reports that insuinuated the man offended was African American , and may be in fact a white offended far left left extreemist.

Or maybe the african American that was offended was a different man sitting in the front row than the blue recall SHIRT wearing far left left wing extreemist who’s photo was used in the urinalists report.

[cuz1961]

So...

Let’s review
..

It’s NOT that the n word is offensive ?

[cuz1961]

Then what is the beef ?

The ‘ context’ of a man upset about property values in regard to small houses being next to 250000 houses ? as reported in the

https://anewscafe.com/2023/05/31/redding/board-chair-orders-african-american-veteran-from-chambers-allows-n-word-hurling-speaker-to-remain/

source.

[bert]

Racial Slur is a mental complex and language obfuscation tool designed to score points when there is no valid rebuttal

[cuz1961]

As with typical far left left wing extreemist positions the truth seems obscured and elusive.

[cuz1961]

Racial Slur is a mental complex and language obfuscation tool designed to score points when there is no valid rebuttal

/\

Rebuttal to what , exactly ?

[cuz1961]

Let’s review the

https://anewscafe.com/2023/05/31/redding/board-chair-orders-african-american-veteran-from-chambers-allows-n-word-hurling-speaker-to-remain/

source for the ‘ context’

\/

That’s when he used the n-word
to say what else he wasn’t;

besides a fool.

/\ \/

This is as close to the context as to how the n word used as I could find .

[cuz1961]

Racial Slur is a mental complex and language obfuscation tool designed to score points when there is no valid rebuttal

/\

Rebuttal to what , exactly ?

None of the articles makes this clear.

Rebuttal that along with not being a fool....?

Rebuttal that small houses next to 250000 houses lowers property values of those 250000 houses ?

What ?

[GMThrust]

Could be from South Africa.

[cuz1961]

That crossed my mind 2 .

I find it interesting how my.original thread(s) on this brought up the subject of

” context “

and the next days news articles addressed the subject of

Context.

So either krcr is a freeper reader
Or a freeper contacted them

Or others outside freepers pointed it out that they had a context problem.

Which ever it was

They recognized context was a problem

And they tried to weasel word the subject of context into their narrative.

I mean really, the context is what intent was ?

No, the context had ‘ something ‘ to do with also not being a fool according to one article

Or ‘ something’ about the property values and small house movement.

I doubt the reporting will get any clearer

and will be twisted with weasel words to something even further that the actual context of how the n word was used

Some direct quotes of the sentance containing the n word would clear the subject up

But the fact that they avoided that in these 2 days of articles

and tried to weasel change the context

tells me they will NEVER give the exact words of the sentance the n word was used in.

I could be wrong

Time will tell the tale.

[Thank You Rush]

“”Barak Obama african american””

AKA halfrican!

[Thank You Rush]

“”the N-word user was permitted to stay and later returned to the public speaker’s podium””

The “whatsit” in charge said the reason for that was to enforce the rule about anyone disrupting a public meeting was to be expelled - asked to leave.