To: Red Badger
“investigates” = investigators?
Words mean things.
2 posted on
05/17/2023 11:00:24 AM PDT by
sauropod
(“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
To: Red Badger
3 posted on
05/17/2023 11:00:27 AM PDT by
Leep
(Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
To: Red Badger
Of course US Attorney General Merrick Garland declined to prosecute Rollins. What would be the basis of a criminal prosecution?
The article mentions ethical breaches and violations of DOJ regulations, but a specific CRIME is conspicuously missing.
4 posted on
05/17/2023 11:07:16 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
To: Red Badger
She thought she had Melanin Privilege, but Garland said “We need to toss those conservatives a bone now and then. Throw her under the bus.”
She’s the unfortunate sacrificial goat. (way too old to be a lamb)
11 posted on
05/17/2023 12:14:26 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else…)
To: Red Badger
When asked to comment she said:
“Moooooooo”
12 posted on
05/17/2023 12:24:27 PM PDT by
Newtoidaho
(All I ask of living is to have no chains on me.)
To: Red Badger
SO what will he new Biden Appointment be? Appellate judge? Circuit judge? Ambassador to Italy?
13 posted on
05/17/2023 12:35:56 PM PDT by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: Red Badger
These political hacks don’t have to abide by the rules of ethics, because they know they will never be held accountable for their violations. It’s as simple as that.
15 posted on
05/17/2023 1:20:59 PM PDT by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson