Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge declares "large capacity" magazines not protected by the Second Amendment
BearingArms.com ^ | 4/20/23 | Cam Edwards

Posted on 04/20/2023 3:09:56 PM PDT by CFW

A U.S. District Judge in Washington, D.C. has declined to grant an injunction against the city’s ban on “large capacity” magazines, ruling that while magazines in general are “arms” protected by the Second Amendment, LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes.

The challenge to the District’s magazine ban, known as Hanson v. D.C., involves four legal gun owners from D.C. who all say that they would possess and carry “large capacity” magazines in their firearms if they weren’t banned by law. The District’s prohibition comes complete with a potential three-year prison sentence, though it’s unclear how often that sentence is handed down in practice, especially with D.C. prosecutors routinely deciding to decline charges in many illegal gun possession cases.

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; anotheridiotjudge; banglist; bruen; dc; donatenra; gunmagban; hansonvdc; heller; magazines; nonsense; rudolphcontreras
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: MachIV

Gunowners of America (GOA) is a much better organization.


61 posted on 04/20/2023 6:03:12 PM PDT by grcuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CFW

D.C. Fed Judge, IE: DIMOCRAT butt kissing liberal appointed by a dim prez.


62 posted on 04/20/2023 6:04:09 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (The SIGNS that Christ spoke of in Matt 24, Luke 21 & Mark 13, are converging together in these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

When you go into a no gun zone it doesn’t matter if you have 3 30rd magazines or 9 10rd magazines everyone is sitting duck.


63 posted on 04/20/2023 7:28:51 PM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

No. A commie judge. A domestic enemy of the constitution. They know exactly what they’re doing.


64 posted on 04/20/2023 7:29:56 PM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: curious7

Yeah.


65 posted on 04/20/2023 7:35:23 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CFW

They want to have it both ways. Some say that the Second Amendment only applies to soldiers in the National Guard, yet others say the Second Amendment doesn’t protect arms such as normal capacity magazines (but rather, only to reduced-capacity ones).

Well, in that case, under what circumstances should soldiers in the National Guard have access to normal-capacity magazines? The Second Amendment doesn’t apply to those items, and yet is supposedly the very provision that allows soldiers to be armed!


66 posted on 04/20/2023 7:56:23 PM PDT by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

Yeah, they do seem to switch between the opinion of “Miller” and the opinions of more recently decided cases.

Which is it? Citizens can only possess guns used by the military? Or, citizens can only possess guns NOT used by the military? Is it the history of keeping guns out of the hands of black slaves? Or is it the history of arming blacks as they are given equal rights?


67 posted on 04/20/2023 8:10:38 PM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Beware of those big clips on those assault weapons.


68 posted on 04/20/2023 8:13:09 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Bad call that SCOTUS will hopefully overturn. Only saving point is there are likely very few high-capacity mags in DC so outcry there will be muted. Try that in Nevada.


69 posted on 04/20/2023 8:19:11 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Go Woke, Go Broke. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

U.S. District Judge in Washington, D.C. is full of communist pig crap and would probably be more comfortable in Beijing.

Better yet, set him in a court in Wuhan a couple of blocks from the bio-lab.


70 posted on 04/20/2023 9:24:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (Woke is a cancer of the mind and humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

If you make that statement, you have to show me where in the second amendment it specifies the number of rounds that your firearm may have to qualify for constitutional protection. But being a liberal judge is the easiest job in the country — you can just make stuff up.


71 posted on 04/20/2023 9:29:20 PM PDT by csn vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“To ban guns because the criminals use them is to tell the law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and lawless.”

Lysander Spooner
___________________

The only reason why the government would want to disarm you after 247 years is because they intend to do something that you would shoot them for.
___________________

Once you give up your guns, they’re going to kill you.
You know that right?


72 posted on 04/20/2023 9:44:11 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

I am a member of GOA.

The NRA has lost 20% of its membership over the last several years thanks mostly to Wayne’s corruption.

I left after 20 years.

Not
Real
Activists


73 posted on 04/21/2023 12:30:04 AM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector
Define large capacity.

They'll want to say anything more than 2 rounds.

...until they'll want to ban derringers, since they can be so easily concealed...

74 posted on 04/21/2023 4:15:12 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Gun laws empower criminals. Guns empower the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac; CFW

Here I was thinking a “poor fit” was done if the magazine wasn’t inserted correctly, was the wrong type of magazine (.45 for a 9 mm, not that it’ll fit at all at all), or a poorly made magazine.


75 posted on 04/21/2023 6:30:24 AM PDT by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ro_dreaming

That makes more sense than what the judge was saying.


76 posted on 04/21/2023 9:07:04 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

It is for self defense, against the government.


77 posted on 04/21/2023 11:34:02 AM PDT by frogjerk (More people have died trusting the government than not trusting the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

i reckon the fact of whether a hcm is a poor fit would be determined by how many rioters were outside my house or place of business. i don’t think the judge would be there to help me reload.


78 posted on 04/21/2023 12:00:20 PM PDT by wildbill (The older I get, the less the term 'life in prison" scares me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

As Lazamataz showed with his reply, the judge is not a moron, stupid are anything of the sort. He went out of his way to distort Alito to come to his ruling. He knew what he was doing. He knows it is a lie and a distortion and he does not care as it gets his ends.


79 posted on 04/21/2023 12:31:28 PM PDT by DevonD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

You want to know what is really crazy? Contreras is the Presiding Judge on the star chamber FISA Court.


80 posted on 04/21/2023 12:52:22 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson