Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW

They want to have it both ways. Some say that the Second Amendment only applies to soldiers in the National Guard, yet others say the Second Amendment doesn’t protect arms such as normal capacity magazines (but rather, only to reduced-capacity ones).

Well, in that case, under what circumstances should soldiers in the National Guard have access to normal-capacity magazines? The Second Amendment doesn’t apply to those items, and yet is supposedly the very provision that allows soldiers to be armed!


66 posted on 04/20/2023 7:56:23 PM PDT by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan

Yeah, they do seem to switch between the opinion of “Miller” and the opinions of more recently decided cases.

Which is it? Citizens can only possess guns used by the military? Or, citizens can only possess guns NOT used by the military? Is it the history of keeping guns out of the hands of black slaves? Or is it the history of arming blacks as they are given equal rights?


67 posted on 04/20/2023 8:10:38 PM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson