In effect, what you are saying is, we cannot arrest a murderer until we have arrested every jaywalker in the country because jaywalking is a crime and murder is a crime and it's **"hypocritical"** to arrest one if we don't arrest all the others too.
And that is surely the very definition of utter blithering insanity, FRiend.
You need to fix that.
Let me ask you, Mr. Brilliant, do you fix your neighbors problems, before you fix your problems?
Your analogy is so ignorant, that I honestly believe my dogs could do a better job. The fact that you came to that conclusion doesn't surprise me, because it's the same kind of conclusions you have been providing all along FRiend. Worthless.
We can't go after murders, until we get all the jaywalkers.
More like, we should focus on the serious crimes, before we even contemplate the little crimes.
But only you would see it in the reverse, and make it seem as if that was what I was saying. It just shows, that you are not a serious thinker at all.
Basically you throw all kinds of propaganda (feces) that you hear that has swayed you, because you are either too lazy, or just not smart enough to exercise critical thinking for yourself, instead of offering facts. You also, throw opinions, thinking those are facts, around like they throw around taxpayer dollars. Amazingly, they have an even slightly better success rate than you.
The answer is: you address your worst problems first.
You don't wait to arrest a murderer until after you've arrested all the jaywalkers, that would be insane.
And when it comes to big countries invading their little neighbors, that will always be our problem too, because it directly attacks the rule of international law on which the American world order is based.
It begins to return the world to the Law of Empires, meaning stronger countries invade & annex their weaker neighbors.
That world will not be friendly to us.
Robert DeLong: "Your analogy is so ignorant, that I honestly believe my dogs could do a better job.
The fact that you came to that conclusion doesn't surprise me, because it's the same kind of conclusions you have been providing all along FRiend.
Worthless."
And here you took over 40 words to say exactly: nothing.
That is certainly a proof of your brilliance.
Robert DeLong: "More like, we should focus on the serious crimes, before we even contemplate the little crimes."
Unjustly invading a foreign country is the most serious crime imaginable, especially when accomplished by mass killing of civilians and unlimited destruction of property.
Our Democrats' "crimes" in this country are matters of elections, laws and law enforcement, and correcting them will require a far different effort than defeating Vlad the Invader's naked aggression in Ukraine.
Robert DeLong: "But only you would see it in the reverse, and make it seem as if that was what I was saying.
It just shows, that you are not a serious thinker at all."
And here again you used over 30 words to say nothing, another proof of your manifest intelligence.
Robert DeLong: "Basically you throw all kinds of propaganda (feces) that you hear that has swayed you, because you are either too lazy, or just not smart enough to exercise critical thinking for yourself, instead of offering facts.
You also, throw opinions, thinking those are facts, around like they throw around taxpayer dollars.
Amazingly, they have an even slightly better success rate than you."
And here you prove yourself to be the closet Democrat that I suspected -- or perhaps a "reformed" Democrat who still thinks the way you were taught to think as a Democrat.
And you already know what that is without me saying it -- Democrats, by their natures, look deep into their own souls to find the worst evils imaginable there, and then they accuse Republicans or their own wickedness!
Here's the truth: you have presented no facts -- zero, nada, zip, zilch facts -- to support your arguments, but have instead only blasted forth with Russian Kool-Aid drinking propaganda.
And then you accuse me of your own misdeeds.