Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Go Ballistic and Call for Tucker Carlson to Be Forcibly Removed From Air: You can tell Tucker is over the target based simply on the hysterical reactions over the last 24 hours
Red State ^ | 03/07/2023 | Bonchie

Posted on 03/07/2023 7:45:46 PM PST by SeekAndFind

You can tell Tucker Carlson is over the target based simply on the hysterical reactions he’s gotten over the last 24 hours. That’s the story after the Fox News host began to release January 6th surveillance footage on Monday evening.

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy gave Carlson access to the footage after Democrats fought for years to keep it under lock and key. Now, we are finding out that many of the narratives spun by the January 6th committee and others were at best misleading and at worst outright false.

RedState has already reported on that extensively on those revelations (click here, here, and here), and apparently, Democrats aren’t a fan of the transparency. After railing on the Senate floor, Chuck Schumer went to the press to demand that Carlson be forcibly removed from the air.

Schumer: "Rupert Murdoch has a special obligation to stop Tucker Carlson from going on tonight [and] from letting him go on again and again and again [because] our democracy depends on it." pic.twitter.com/uld6eaCl3C

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) March 7, 2023

For starters, it seems rather fascist (or communistic, if you prefer) to have a politician making that kind of demand. A special obligation? Really? Because Carlson released some surveillance footage that Schumer desperately wanted to hide?

It’s an insane and totalitarian position to take. It’s also incredibly hypocritical given Democrats spend every waking moment decrying the coming end of “democracy.” Do you know what ends democracy? Politicians trying to get television hosts kicked off the air for saying stuff they don’t like.

Ask yourself this. What are Schumer and his cohorts so afraid of? Carlson is simply releasing footage that they themselves refused to release. Nancy Pelosi could have let the public see all of it from the get-go. No one made the January 6th committee selectively edit and obfuscate the truth. They chose to do that because they wanted to push a very specific narrative, and they chose to cover up any inconvenient facts for posterity.

That’s what this comes down to. Schumer is afraid of the truth. He’s afraid that his neatly packaged “insurrection” narrative will be blown up by reality, a reality that he fought so hard to hide.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1a; bloggers; capitol; capitolriot; demonicrats; firstamendment; foxnews; j6; j6footage; j6narrative; jan6; jan6footage; jan6th; january6; removeschumer; schumer; tuckercarlson; tuckerrocks; video
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: central_va

Careful, CEO of Newmax Christopher Ruddy is a known GOPe.


101 posted on 03/08/2023 7:40:08 AM PST by apostoli (When the Saxon awakes, continents will BURN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They had their time for 2 years. Tucker shows evidence for an hour and heads explode.


102 posted on 03/08/2023 8:14:33 AM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tucker delivers the sting of truth the democrats squirm like a stabbed snake.

Democrats aren’t a fan of the transparency.


103 posted on 03/08/2023 8:24:24 AM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

I think Jimmy Carter went round that bend about 30 years ago, and about 20 years ago leapt off the cliff.


104 posted on 03/08/2023 8:19:56 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Tonight he concentrated on other simple lies about January 6th, pointing out that pretty near every aspect of the claims made by commentators and politicians about how it was the worst attack on Congress since the Civil War was absurd on its face. It wasn’t even the worst within the year, and the folks wailing had no concern about the assault on the White House.


105 posted on 03/08/2023 9:32:57 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

hissy fit


106 posted on 03/09/2023 4:07:34 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Schumer: “Rupert Murdoch has a special obligation to stop Tucker Carlson from going on tonight [and] from letting him go on again and again and again [because] our democracy depends on it.”

Imagine such a thing... in America. What if a GOP had said the same about Scarborough?


107 posted on 03/09/2023 5:26:35 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Stupid is supposed to hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Like it when they show how nuts they are


108 posted on 03/09/2023 7:02:32 AM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Well, he’s in it now. He can’t blink.


109 posted on 03/09/2023 9:04:57 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: apostoli

Is he? I thought he was a Hillary Apparatchik.


110 posted on 03/09/2023 4:26:46 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Imagine such a thing... in America. What if a GOP had said the same about Scarborough?

- - - - - - -

Imagine if Gingrich said he would beat up a leftist Supreme Court judge over a court ruling


111 posted on 03/09/2023 4:38:16 PM PST by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson