Posted on 02/10/2023 7:23:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
George Hill is a military veteran and a former analyst for the NSA who has retired from the FBI’s Boston field office. Hill recently talked to the House Judiciary Committee about the FBI’s probe of the events surrounding the January 6 riot at the nation’s Capitol. He also talked with Just the News Wednesday night about his concerns surrounding the agency’s activities.
According to Hill, agents at the Boston field office were pressured to open criminal cases against people who had done nothing wrong. Originally, agents were told to open cases against seven people who raised red flags during a sweep of records from the Bank of America. Then, the scope increased to include people who had merely taken a bus to the Trump rally. Hill said that the act of getting on a bus was not enough to merit criminal probes, and the Boston office refused to conduct the investigations. This greatly displeased the Washington field office. The issue moved up the chain of command in an effort to paint J6 participants as domestic terrorists, but the Boston office held its ground.
Hill told the committee that the FBI analyzed bank records without evidence of any crimes with the intent to discover who went to Washington around the time of the incident and to look for any records that might indicate gun ownership. Hill said that the banks voluntarily offered up the data on the people under investigation.
Further, Hill said he got pushback from the agency to see video from the incident to determine if any of the 140 people in question were present.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
When you ask for footage, what they’ll come back with is ‘Tell us the exact place and time where you think the subject of your investigation was?’ To which the standard reply is, ‘Well, we don’t know because we can’t see the footage.’ And the comeback then is ‘There may be identities within that footage that we need to protect. So one can make inferences regarding that, who those identities were they were looking to protect, but that probably wasn’t their grandparents or their aunts and uncles.
As this information comes to light, National Review reports that an internal memo was issued at the FBI’s Richmond field office in January. This time the cause for concern was radical traditionalist Catholic ideology, which “almost certainly presents new mitigation opportunities.” This information came from Kyle Seraphin, who had served as an agent for six years and was suspended without pay in June 2020. He published the document called “Interest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities,” on the website UncoverDC.com. You can access it here.
Radical Traditional Catholics, or as the document calls them RTCs, are characterized as rejecting the Second Vatican Council, preferring the Latin Mass, and holding views about other religions that equate to “anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ and white supremacist ideology.” But the writer of the memo also says that there is a difference between the people who hold radical views and those who simply prefer pre-Vatican II policies and the Latin Mass.
According to the piece released by Seraphin, the memo uses information from the Southern Poverty Law Center as a source. National Review points out that SPLC has included Alliance Defending Freedom and the American College of Pediatricians on its list of hate groups. Seraphin told The Daily Signal that when he was in training at Quantico, SPLC was not considered legitimate. the memo also cites articles from Salon and The Atlantic, hardly neutral publications.
Where are the Republicans in denouncing the lgbtq hostile takeover of a state Capitol bui,ding? Why haven’t they been arrested for “insurrection”? Republicans in co guess should be screaming g about the injustice and hypocrisy of the left! I stead we only get an occasional mention of the political prisoners still being held for walking into Capitol grounds after BEING INVITED IN by grounds security.
The January 6th “un-armed” insurrection. First in world history!
Yup, and that is what is so asinine about the claim of insurrection. Code pink also took over a Capitol bui,ding, did a bunch of damage apparently, and were never charged with anything.
Liberals by and large are jusy hateful, vengeful scum.
Someday I expect to see a headline: “FBI to posthumously charge Charles “The Hammer” Martel for hate crimes.”
We're on our own and have been for decades.
Those guys didn’t do too well. We’ll need a different strategy. Besides, simply waiting for the next election has cost us dearly. The enemy has been fighting and jockeying for position while we’ve been waiting for Repugnant KongressKreeps to do the job.
Special people like democrats are never arrested. We are in CWII, folks.
Sadly you are right. Hundreds of patriots have ,ost 2 or more years of their life, lost their jobs, likely lost their families too, for the simlpe act of protesting election results when things looked crooked. Their lives have been uprooted and destroyed by demon driven revenge inspired liberals who were pissed that Hillary lost.
Any question they were targeting anyone registered Repub.
“Interest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities”
Mitigated with extreme prejudice! Another group mainly comprised of white men that white male FBI agents can easily infiltrate in order to mitigate.
Freegards
I don’t even know where to find a catacomb.
The FBI has finally found a worthy opponent; blue-haired old ladies and geriatric nuns..
*sigh*
Banks are a subsidiary of the government. (De facto, not de jure). When banks violate your Constitutional rights, it’s the government that’s doing it, and it is violating the law.
Little old ladies praying at a Latin Mass are one dangerous bunch and should be arrested for meditating.
Or is government a subsidiary of the banks?
Either way, it's an example of the privatization of oppression. The Constitution doesn't allow government to suppress speech, so the Deep State outsources it to "private companies."
I don't know of any traditional Catholic group that's racist or even anti-immigrant.
Traditional Catholics do believe that homosexual acts are sinful, but can be forgiven if repented of.
That the Church is Israel, whereas the modern state of Israel is just another country without any theological significance. And that only Christ gets you to heaven, and not Judaism (or any other religion).
Is that what they mean by "anti-Semitic?" Are those views now illegal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.