Skip to comments.
Efforts Underway To Study Chinese Surveillance Balloon After Downed
THE STANDEFORD JOURNAL ^
| 2/5/23
| Donald Standeford
Posted on 02/05/2023 8:43:07 AM PST by C210N
UNITED STATES - After the United States Air Force carried out the operation to shoot down the Chinese surveillance balloon, efforts underway to study and scrutinize both the balloon and its payload.
...
The statement added, "The balloon fell approximately six miles off the coast in about 47 feet of water. No one was hurt".
(Excerpt) Read more at ssj.news ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: balloon; bidenforeignpolicy; chinaballoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
"The senior military official who spoke to reporters Saturday said, "The debris is in 47 feet of water, primarily -- the recovery, that will make it fairly easy".Damn those NE winds nearly pushed it all the way back to shore.
21
posted on
02/05/2023 9:17:37 AM PST
by
StAnDeliver
(Tanned, rested, and ready.)
To: Brilliant
I suspect we did not even know that the balloon was there until it was over Montana. Otherwise why would we not shoot it down over Alaska?
A very large payload with enormous satellite-style solar panel "wings" would have a huge radar cross-section, and a significant visual signature. The thing was probably visible for 100+ miles to aircraft above the clouds (most flights at those latitudes) and visible on early-warning radar for probably a couple thousand. Heck, it probably showed up as an anomaly on civilian radar satellites (Sentinel-1 etc). It wasn't subtle. I can almost guarantee we knew about it.
The heartburn-inducing part of your statement is the final question- why wouldn't we shoot it down [before it performed its mission over the US / it didn't necessarily come in over Alaska- probably came in over B.C. and Alberta]. The very painful answer to that is- have you noticed who the commander-in-chief of the military has been since January 20th, 2021..?
Yes, in a sane world we'd have shot the damn thing down over the Pacific and probably never said a thing.
We haven't lived in a sane world for awhile now...
22
posted on
02/05/2023 9:20:00 AM PST
by
verum ago
(I figure some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
To: C210N
“No one was hurt”
FU!!
We we’re all hurt now and into the future as China uses the sensor data to map our vulnerabilities.
To: pfflier
Rest assured that whatever data was collected was transmitted directly to the CCP. Any data storage on board will be encrypted and impossible for us to decipher. All they will get in their recovery efforts is worthless metal and plastic.
24
posted on
02/05/2023 9:28:14 AM PST
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: newzjunkey
You nailed it.
The excuse not to shoot it down over land because it might hurt or kill somebody was total BS which played into the emotions of the touchy-feely sheep. It sure gave the Chinese time to accomplish their mission.
25
posted on
02/05/2023 9:33:29 AM PST
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: GingisK
Instruments don’t fare well when blown up
26
posted on
02/05/2023 9:34:59 AM PST
by
no-to-illegals
(The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
To: no-to-illegals
“They blew the balloon up and want to study it. That’s hilarious”
Wrong! The missile didn’t blow anything up. It deflated the balloon.
The problem is the damage to the equipment from the fall.
27
posted on
02/05/2023 9:36:29 AM PST
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: verum ago
28
posted on
02/05/2023 9:37:53 AM PST
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: C210N
Efforts underway.
Gee, I hope nobody bruises their knee.
29
posted on
02/05/2023 9:38:30 AM PST
by
eyedigress
(Trump is my President!)
To: laplata
30
posted on
02/05/2023 9:40:05 AM PST
by
no-to-illegals
(The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
To: verum ago
Is it possible our people jammed transmission back to China?
Or did they allow transmission because they are compromised?
31
posted on
02/05/2023 9:40:50 AM PST
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: no-to-illegals
“Instruments don’t fare well when blown up”
They weren’t blown up.
32
posted on
02/05/2023 9:42:22 AM PST
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: laplata
33
posted on
02/05/2023 9:43:16 AM PST
by
no-to-illegals
(The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
To: C210N
First it puts a lie to the idea our military could not shoot it down over Montana, second rather that shoot it down over land where recovery would be easier they waited until it was over salt water which will on its own destroy any electrical connection that may remain.
It is almost as if they did not want to recover the balloon and it’s payload.
34
posted on
02/05/2023 9:43:59 AM PST
by
CIB-173RDABN
(I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
To: laplata
Missile hit the equipment package.
35
posted on
02/05/2023 9:48:18 AM PST
by
linMcHlp
To: C210N
THE CORRECT RESPONSE IS FOR bidet TO SEND A FOUR STAR GENERAL TO MEET WITH PRESIDENT XI.
To: Rapscallion
I presume the 4-Star General that last week warned about war with China by 2025 would fit the bill.
37
posted on
02/05/2023 9:53:41 AM PST
by
C210N
(Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
To: C210N
I don’t trust a damn thing the government says about this.
38
posted on
02/05/2023 9:54:06 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Big Red Badger
WUHAN FIRST, BALLOON SECOND, THIRD...A NUKE?
To: C210N
I doubt they’ll find anything, China expected this balloon to be shut down
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson