Many of us, myself included, predicted this very thing, Roberts being the CJ.
To: libstripper
Fire 100 percent of the High Court clerks.
2 posted on
01/31/2023 7:50:28 AM PST by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.q at)
To: libstripper
Either Roberts, Sotomayor, or Kagen leaked it. That’s why they didn’t “find” the leaker.
3 posted on
01/31/2023 7:53:29 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: libstripper
I have always questioned how Roberts became Chief Justice even though he had never served on the highest court. It stunk back then and he still stinks. I think they wanted to install someone they could control, someone who was compromised.
4 posted on
01/31/2023 7:53:46 AM PST by
FamiliarFace
(I got my own way of livin' But everything gets done With a southern accent Where I come from. TP)
To: All
I’d bet 100 bucks it was Elizabeth Deutsch
5 posted on
01/31/2023 7:54:32 AM PST by
escapefromboston
(Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
To: libstripper
“the marshal’s team was “unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.””
In plain English, the person responsible is someone whom is above the law in post-Constitutional Washington. Above the law for reasons of Party, Race, Seniority, Political beliefs or being related to a member of the nobility.
7 posted on
01/31/2023 7:58:59 AM PST by
Tupelo
(A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand)
To: libstripper
One wonders what security training, experience, and associated staff SCOTUS Marshal Gail Curley has. Are key logs recorded for individual computers and workstations on which draft opinions are accessible? Are SOPs established for access to copying machines? Are chain of custody records kept on draft opinions? Do printed copies have coded identification marks embedded within the pages? Were lie detectors used in the questioning of staff and justices?
The Public Report indicates that there needs to be serious upgrades in SCOTUS document and IT security.
9 posted on
01/31/2023 8:05:23 AM PST by
Carl Vehse
(A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
To: libstripper
Roberts is no Diana Ross but is the Chris Wray of the Supremes.
To: libstripper
Look how fast and efficiently the Federal Government identified the peacefully protesting US citizens on January 6!
And indicted them and shipped them off to the gulag!
The US Federal Government is corrupt and rotten to the core. Ultimately it is the American People who are responsible. It is they who tolerate the defilement of this most sacred of all nations, the United States of America.
12 posted on
01/31/2023 8:26:14 AM PST by
Savage Beast
("Truth never comes to the closed mind.")
To: libstripper
I believe one or more justices colluded to leak. Then the squishy ones were leveraged to rule in favor of striking down Roe when they normally would never have done so. They did it as one more plank in their “get Trump no matter the cost” efforts.
And abortions continue, unabated in most states. See Minnesota.
15 posted on
01/31/2023 8:57:40 AM PST by
subterfuge
(I'm a pure-blood!)
To: libstripper
Looks to me like SCOTUS has it’s very own Pope Francis.
17 posted on
01/31/2023 9:00:43 AM PST by
matthew fuller
(Democrats aren't about Socialism, or Communism. They are all about Ghettoism!)
To: libstripper
What has happened to Newsweek? I’m liking it. This is the third article I’ve read recently from Newsweek that is not lefty propaganda.
22 posted on
01/31/2023 2:38:11 PM PST by
Albion Wilde
("There is no good government at all & none possible."--Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson