Posted on 01/23/2023 2:05:28 PM PST by dennisw
Is that the best you can do?
I've been in Poland since 2010, and have dual citizenship now, but nope, no Polish ancestry, not an iota.
You do realize that the origin of those jokes were because in the 19th century the lower educated members of Polish society migrated to the USA which led to those stereotypes. The Chopins, the Mickiewicz's, Sienkiewicz', Boleslaw Prus' didn't migrate - or they stayed in the friendlier Austrian partition of Poland
And Joseph COnrad was Polish as was Marie Curie
So your silly remark just belies your own lack of knowledge
And desertRhino — if you look at Russian propaganda in
The USA it is always the same: Oh, this was due to NATO “expansion”, Poor Russia (the largest country in the world) felt surrounded, there is Russophobia OR this is bad for the west’s economy, give up Ukraine.
internally to Russia (and you can see this in TASS, in Russia media) it is Ukraine never existed, only Russia; they are Nazis, not the little Russians , etc. etc.
If you look at newspapers from South Africa, India etc. it is “Russia is fighting against the imperialists. Ignore that we are trying to recreate our imperium in Ukraine”, or “This is Russian land, the west is trying to take it away, like they do to you”
I don’t deal with people of low intelligence, I don’t have the patience for it. Wake up, we’re all in danger because of the west’s retardation.
“but the nazi element in Ukraine calls the tune.”
The President of Ukraine is a Jew
The Prime Minister of Ukraine is a Jew
The defense minister was a Jew
The easiest way to debunk such craziness is to ask yourself if a Nazi nation of would elect a Jewish president? Zelensky was elected by 70% of the vote in Ukraine.
The ones you label Nazis - Azov = They got less than 1% in the last elections, not surprisingly, and have no representation in Parliament.
it's just like the common refrain that "ukraine was always a part of Russia"
here is the European map of 1600
And in 1700
Ukraine was a border country between the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth (not "Poland"), the Tsardom of Muscowy (not "Russia" yet, not until 1721) and the Ottomans (not "Turkey")
Ukraine as well as the Tsardom of Muscowy as well as the Commonwealth were the target of slave raids by the Crimean Tatars (not the Turks per se - they just bought the slaves when they were sent from Crimea south)
While right-bank Ukraine belonged to the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth until late 1793, left-bank Ukraine had been incorporated into Tsardom of Russia in 1667 (under the Treaty of Andrusovo). In 1672, Podolia was occupied by the Turkish Ottoman Empire, while Kyiv and Braclav came under the control of Hetman Petro Doroshenko until 1681, when they were also captured by the Turks, but in 1699 the Treaty of Karlowitz returned those lands to the Commonwealth.
Most of Ukraine fell to the Russian Empire under the reign of Catherine the Great; in 1793 right-bank Ukraine was annexed by Russia in the Second Partition of Poland.
However, the Ukrainians are a separate East Slavic people - distinct from Muscowy. Just as the Slovaks differ from the Czechs
Moscow tried to assimilate them - and when they did so through culture, they were mildly successful, but when they imposed forced Russification from the 1870s, especially the crushing of the Uniate Church, they pushed people to feeling the sense of "other". This was especially the case under the Soviets - Stalin (a Georgian!) imposed Russification on the Soviets. Think of it this way - France in 1780 had only 10% speaking French i.e. Parisian dialect; Italy in 1850 had a similar number speaking Italian i.e. the Milanese dialect. Sicilian is not mutually intelligible with standard Italian, and Breton is a separate language. But the people took up French and Italian due to cultural pressures and most do not have the aim to set up a separate state. This could have happened in Eastern Europe in the 1800s, but hamfisted actions made people pull further apart and today they are separate nations.
Well then why do you say "we’re all in danger because of the west’s retardation." - retardation = slowness or limitation in intellectual understanding and awareness, emotional development, academic progress,
IF the West said that sending weapons to a country to defend itself is a "provocation", that would be retarded
Yes, I know all of this.
If you go back far enough all these countries were nipping at each other’s borders, e.g. 30 Years War, “Time of Troubles - Russia”, various wars with the Ottomans- who had Christian vassal states who had to contribute militarily, etc. I could go on! That’s how I interrupted his statement.
Ok he wasn’t as accurate as I implied. However, it was more historically insightful than hurling Nazi Nazi around which is what most people do that discuss this. That was my point. I apologize for making it clumsily!
Lol I like it
Actually, Poland did invade “Slovakia*” in 1938.
“In 1938 Poland pursued its own territorial claims, and gave an ultimatum to the Czechoslovak government, which resulted in the annexation of the Zaolzie* region which in fact had a Polish majority”
* A border area that separated Czech lands from Slovakia.
I vaguely remembered this; had to look up the details.
And they had been taking “whacks” at each other for some time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Czechoslovak_border_conflicts
Nobody had sparkling clean hands! Europe has centuries of conflict leaving dislikes to ancient hatreds.
True.
Have you read William L Shirer’s “the rise and fall of Nazi Germany”?
I picked it up again a few days ago to read the chapters on the Anschluss and the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia. And, yes, it seems like P and friends just did a copy-paste in their actions and even accusations :)
I read about, how, in 1938 the American ambassador to Berlin was told that “Czechoslovakia is trying to provoke a pan-European war and must be stopped.”
And Goering a few days later calling the Czechs “This miserable pygmy race is oppressing a cultured people”
Read it in high school.
Welcome back after a long break! The Bush Crime Family stooges keep resurrecting from the dead to boost the Forever War.
Different war.
No, the Forever War is Iraq, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Ukraine, and all of the "special" operations between and during.
Why America Can't End Its 'Forever Wars'
BY WILLIAM M. ARKIN ON 04/12/21 AT 6:00 AM EDT
In our topsy-turvy world, the United States today is killing or bombing in perhaps 10 different countries. Some we know for sure: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen. Some occasionally are acknowledged—Libya, Niger, Mali and Uganda. Others are more obscure—Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Lebanon, Nigeria. And still others—the Philippines, Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Thailand—are alluded to in fleeting news reports or hinted at in military deployments and supposed war games with host nation forces.
Source https://www.newsweek.com/why-america-cant-end-its-forever-wars-1582749
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.