Posted on 12/24/2022 12:34:42 PM PST by TigerClaws
PHOENIX - A judge has thrown out Republican Kari Lake’s challenge of her defeat in the Arizona governor’s race to Democrat Katie Hobbs, rejecting her claim that problems with ballot printers at some polling places on Election Day were the result of intentional misconduct.
In a decision Saturday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson, who was appointed by then-Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, found that the court did not find clear and convincing evidence of the widespread misconduct that Lake had alleged had affected the result of the 2022 general election.
Buy Lottery Tickets From Home Slips | Download on the App Store | Sponsored Lake, who lost to Hobbs by just over 17,000 votes, was among the most vocal 2022 Republicans promoting former President Donald Trump’s election lies, which she made the centerpiece of her campaign. While most of the other election deniers around the country conceded after losing their races in November, Lake has not. Instead, she asked the judge to either declare her the winner or order a revote in Maricopa County.
Lawyers for Lake focused on problems with ballot printers at some polling places in Maricopa County, home to more than 60% of Arizona’s voters. The defective printers produced ballots that were too light to be read by the on-site tabulators at polling places. Lines backed up in some areas amid the confusion.
Kari Lake's team will have until 5 p.m. on Dec. 26 to file a response, and any motion for sanctions will need to be submitted by 8 a.m. that morning.
Click to open this PDF in a new window. County officials say everyone had a chance to vote and all ballots were counted, since ballots affected by the printers were taken to more sophisticated counters at the elections department headquarters. They are in the process of investigating the root cause of the printer problems.
Lake’s attorneys also claimed the chain of custody for ballots was broken at an off-site facility, where a contractor scans mail ballots to prepare them for processing. They claim workers at the facility put their own mail ballots into the pile, rather than sending their ballots through normal channels, and also that paperwork documenting the transfer of ballots was missing. The county disputes the claim.
Lake faced extremely long odds in her challenge, needing to prove not only that misconduct occurred, but also that it was intended to deny her victory and did in fact result in the wrong woman being declared the winner.
Her attorneys pointed to a witness who examined ballots on behalf of her campaign and discovered 14 ballots that had 19-inch images of the ballot printed on 20-inch paper, meaning the ballots wouldn’t be read by a tabulator. The witness insisted someone changed those printer configurations, a claim disputed by elections officials.
County officials say the ballot images were slightly smaller as a result of a shrink-to-fit feature being selected on a printer by a tech employee who was looking for solutions to Election Day issues. They say about 1,200 ballots were affected by turning on the feature and that those ballots were duplicated so that they could be read by a tabulator. Ultimately, these ballots were counted, officials said.
A person who takes public-opinion polls testified on behalf of Lake, claiming technical problems at polling places had disenfranchised enough voters that it would have changed the outcome of the race in Lake’s favor. But an expert who was called to testify by election officials said there was no evidence to back up the pollster’s claim that 25,000 to 40,000 people who would normally have voted actually didn’t cast ballots as a result of Election Day problems.
Thompson had previously dismissed eight of the 10 claims Lake raised in her lawsuit. Among those were Lake’s allegation that Hobbs, in her capacity as secretary of state, and Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer engaged in censorship by flagging social media posts with election misinformation for possible removal by Twitter. He also dismissed her claims of discrimination against Republicans and that mail-in voting procedures are illegal.
Hobbs takes office as governor on Jan. 2.
Her campaign released the following statement:
"Last month, Arizonans made their voices heard at the ballot box. They chose sanity over chaos, and commonsense, bipartisan results over division. The voters of Arizona – not the conspiracy-riddled, dark corners of the Internet – are the ones who choose our leaders. We’re pleased that the courts have upheld the will of the voters, and Governor-Elect Hobbs is continuing the work of preparing to take office as Arizona’s next governor."
Earlier on Friday, another judge dismissed Republican Abraham Hamadeh’s challenge of results in his race against Democrat Kris Mayes for Arizona attorney general. The court concluded that Hamadeh, who finished 511 votes behind Mayes and hasn’t conceded the race, didn’t prove the errors in vote counting that he had alleged.
A court hearing is scheduled Thursday to present results of recounts in the races for attorney general, state superintendent and for a state legislative seat.
And Kati didn’t ?
Clearly we need the RNC out of our lives completely.
The short answer is incompetence.
Scott Johnson at Powerline had a friend (Local Arizona Attorney Jack Clifford) watch the proceedings and guest blog about them:
Day 1:
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/12/jack-clifford-lake-v-hobbs-day-1.php
Day 2:
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/12/jack-clifford-lake-v-hobbs-day-2.php
The short answer is that Hobbs proved Maricopa County is incompetent, but did not prove it incompetent enough to change the results, and did not prove fraud.
It was stolen…everybody knows it.
And don’t get me started on those Italian satellites.
Yup
Unable to provide proof of intentional misconduct sank her as expected. Election fraud is a crime and to date, no one has been charged.
You speak like a Linda Graham and Tim Scott Bootlicker. “SC” does stand for South Carolina, correct?
Either way, you speak like a Demonrat or RINO supporter. Real Americans should just shut up and politely look the other way at election stealing. That’s damnable and traitorous.
You probably accept Xiden as your president.
“Lake faced extremely long odds in her challenge, needing to prove not only that misconduct occurred, but also that it was intended to deny her victory and did in fact result in the wrong woman being declared the winner.”
So did Lake ever find the people who made the changes? If not, why not? It seems like her ability to win was predicated on proving this, based on what the law was.
Beside the fact that most of the judges are corrupt, and doing whatever the political winds tell them to do. Can you imagine what would happen to a judge who bucks the deep state.
Local court judges are not appointed by Presidents.🙄
Isn’t this a state\county judge?
WalkerinSC FR born-on date: 2021-09-16...
About time? Only if you’re in Chicago ;)
Hobbs knows the recall effort is coming so standby for the legislature to change the recall statute to prevent Lake’s attempt to have her recalled. Mark Elias is probably already writing the law to be passed on an expedited legislative session.
Opaque reply.
Can the judge define what he means by 'widespread misconduct'?????
Seems to me if only one vote was counted improperly that voter was disenfranchised and the vote count would be bogus!
For some odd reason, boomers and conservatives in general have trusted government even thru korea, vietnam, jfk assassination, iran contra, 9/11/Afghanistan, iraq war, bank bailouts, fbi, etc.
Well, no, that’s not what the judge said. The judge said that in the presence of problems, voters were given alternatives.
“The Court notes that Mr. Parikh also acknowledged a fact admitted by several of Plaintiff’s witnesses: that any ballot that could not be read due to BOD printer or tabulator failure could be submitted for ballot duplication and adjudication through Door 3 on the tabulators. Plaintiff’s own expert acknowledged that a ballot that was unable to be read at the vote center could be deposited by a voter, duplicated by a bipartisan board onto a readable ballot, and – in the final analysis – counted. Thus, Plaintiff’s expert on this point admitted that the voters who suffered from tabulator rejections would nevertheless have their votes counted. This, at a minimum, means that the actual impact element of Count II could not be proven. The BOD printer failures did not actually affect
the results of the election.” (page 6)
“It is worth repeating that ballots that could not be read by the tabulator immediately because of printer settings – or anything else – could be deposited in Door 3 of the tabulator and counted later after duplication by a bipartisan adjudication board.” (page 7)
Wow! Where’s my shocked face? When you’re dealing with fascist”judges” who believe they are God, Americans are always going to take it in the shorts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.