Posted on 11/01/2022 12:18:15 PM PDT by conservative98
Megyn Kelly isn’t buying the San Francisco Police Department’s version of events as it investigates the assault on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband.
“I know enough to smell a rat,” the former Fox News and NBC star said during her podcast on Monday.
During an interview with Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on her SiriusXM podcast on Monday, Kelly blasted any notion that the attack on Paul Pelosi, 82, was politically motivated, pointing out that the suspect, David DePape, 42, is a “lunatic.”
“I feel like at a minimum, the SFPD has egg on its face because even under the most generous story to Paul Pelosi and to the San Francisco police, they were in the house when this guy attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer,” Kelly said.
“I’m not sure how that happened,” the former Fox News primetime star continued. “How do you have police officers on site and an 82-year-old gets attacked with a hammer in front of you when you have a gun as a police officer?”
Kelly added: “It’s one of the many questions here. As you point out, there are security cameras all over that house. You can see them from the outside where they turned on.”
“If not, why not? She’s the speaker of the House.”
Kelly noted that “far less known public figures than Nancy Pelosi have taken extra security measures in and around San Francisco, given how high the crime rate is there, it would be insane for them not to have their cameras on.”
She agreed with Cotton’s call for the police to release bodycam footage of officers’ arrival at the home.
“Let’s see it,” Kelly said. “Let’s see it all. I don’t know what went on. I know enough to smell a rat. There’s something going on here that they’re not
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
It’s probably thermal pane glass. Any external windows/doors replaced in the last 15 years, especially in a high end area, is going to be that thermal “energy efficient” glass.
even their computers getting scrambled by alleged security measures to protect the nation’s Number Three.Wha?
Exactly what does it actually mean when a media talking head tells us something we already know?
Wow! A pic to click on. Way to go.
As I said, you’re the only one stating a problem.
.
The Expressions of the Police Chief noticeably changed when asked about how they got in.
The strategy is to say less as to reduce the chance of revealing the lie.
The idiot DA said it was 2-layered glass, with plastic in between the glass layers, so glass fell in and out. Sounds like BS to me. Looks like it was broken from the inside, as you said.
Aaaannd…scene.
(Well done!)
Yes!
That’s from “How can you be in two places at once when you’re not anywhere at all.”, the flip side of Nick Danger.
There are no armed security guards there when she’s not at the residence. There are plenty of cameras, though. The type of glass used in the doors/windows of the location is not regular glass. It’s closer to plexiglass which means it “bounces” when you strike it, which explains why some was on the exterior patio. A few months ago someone just walked right up to that same location and defecated on their driveway. Anyone can just walk up to it. Unless she’s there. Then there is a 24-hour police presence.
Again that makes zero sense. It's an 80 year old husband of the person 3rd in line for the Presidency all by himself? Nope. Easy to overpower or kidnap and/or leave a bomb at the residence, poison the food or a million other ways to kill the Pelosi remotely.
I didn’t say it makes sense. I just said that’s the procedure. Capitol Polce have, I believe, two agents permanently assigned to San Fran, but they are investigators. They do not provide physical security to the Speakers house.
David DePape might get deported back to Canada, and then, we will never see him nor hear from or about him again.
?
Not sure why you’re arguing about this
First place, you don’t know about either of your points. You don’t know if there is or is not security tgere.
You’re just wanting to argue it seems
But I did not say there was security there. I said there likely would have been staff. A household staff includes housekeeper
Period. A man who is 82 years old with tens of millions to spend does not stay alone without a live in housekeeper. I know 82 year old men and I know some multi millionaires. No way
Two, some stoned out neighbor kid middle of the day can vandalize a house. A weird guy who ends up being violent is not getting past the gate security. And he is not sneaking over a wall into someone’s backyard neither one at 2 AM
I have a silly alarm system. Someone pounds on a window breaking it the cops are getting an immediate alarm and they’re at my house
What is the problem with people here.
This guy did not break into that house
This is incorrect. I know, for a fact, that there is no armed security at that townhouse when she is not there. Does he have staff? I have no idea.
Not even sensible.
You know everything You know why he broke in (Undetected by everyone)
Double-paned windows leave debris on BOTH sides when they get smashed. Plenty of the glass bits from the first layer strike the second layer and bounce back TOWARD the impact landing on the SAME side of the pane that the impact came from. Glass from the second layer primarily winds up on the opposite side of the pane from the impact. Fragments that don’t break loose initially, will continue to fall and may bounce to either side as the crystallized remnants of the two panes keep fracturing and disintegrating.
When I was a kid, back before double panes were widely used, a neighbor had their sliding glass door struck by a small object — perhaps a shot from a pellet gun. Initially, there was only a round “bulls-eye” in the glass. An hour later, there were running cracks extending from the point of impact. By the next morning, the entire pane had fractured into irregularly-shaped glass crystals less then 1/4” along any edge. The entire pane remained intact until the guy from the glass company came and — with two gloved hands placed about 2/3 the way up — pushed it outward toward the outside of the house. Then it let go all at once, and fell into a heap on the threshold, leaving fragmented “curtains” of glass in the upper corners of the frame.
Glass is weird stuff, frankly.
ALSO, forget the glass for the moment, and look at the part of the window frame that’s missing. There’s a horizontal member that’s gone.
Where did it end up?
INSIDE.
I think, if we’re going to use anything as a “go by,” the resting place of that stick of framing is pretty damned conclusive.
You can see it CLEARLY through the hole in the glass lying on the floor inside the house.
As for the glass debris outside; that’s not nearly enough to account for a hole that size through two panes, but there’s a whole lot more glass debris visible on the floor inside.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.