Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Igor Danchenko trial: Anti-Trump dossier source found not guilty in Russia investigation trial
Washington Examiner ^ | 10-18-22 | Jerry Dunleavy

Posted on 10/18/2022 1:38:53 PM PDT by Revel

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia — A jury has found Russian national Igor Danchenko not guilty on four false statements charges, declining to convict him for the allegations that the main source of British ex-spy Christopher Steele had lied to the FBI about his sourcing for the discredited anti-Trump dossier.

The jury reached their decision on Tuesday after less than two days of deliberations, delivering John Durham another defeat in his long-running investigation of the Trump-Russia investigators, after the special counsel lost another false statements case against a Clinton campaign lawyer in May.

According to Durham’s November 2021 indictment, Danchenko anonymously sourced a fabricated claim about Trump 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort to Charles Dolan, a Clinton ally who spent years, including 2016, doing work for Russian businesses and the Russian government, but in a blow to Durham’s case, the judge threw out that charge before the jury could decide on it.

One charge had been dismissed by the judge last week, and on Tuesday a jury was reached shortly before the end of the day. It has not been announced yet.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; US: Virginia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: alexandria; anthonytrenga; arrestanthonytrenga; charlesdolan; christophersteele; danchenkotrial; deepstate; igordanchenko; johndurham; kangaroocourt; paulmanafort; russia; russiahoax; spygate; steeledossier; trumprussiacollusion; unfitforthebench; unitedkingdom; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last
To: DarthVader
I hardly ever comment on FR these days, but your response certainly needs repeating.

"This only justifies those who want to rectify this situation by other more harsh means."

I searched the entire thread and was surprised to find this sentiment so far down.

Conservatives have always been champions of law and order.

Where indeed do they (we) turn when the system fails the "rule of law and order"?

And yet another reason to punctuate the fact that we live, indeed, in perilous times.

101 posted on 10/18/2022 3:50:18 PM PDT by ImpBill (America! Has anybody seen her lately?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
But Republicans in Congress should now have the upper hand.

The GOP never has hand. Never.


102 posted on 10/18/2022 3:53:18 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (To solve the Democrat problem, the RINO problem must first be solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Revel

The not guilty verdict was pre-determined long ago. They just had to go through the motions to get there.


103 posted on 10/18/2022 4:06:05 PM PDT by Kevin in California (EP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Here’s my take on the verdict :

The question after this verdict then becomes: if you lied to the FBI, but the FBI didn’t care enough to thoroughly investigate what you lied about, do they really count as genuine lies or just lies that FBI political hacks didn’t care about?

That’s what it’s looking like to me!


104 posted on 10/18/2022 5:01:18 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Durham isn’t trying to lose. He’s trying to build a case against the higher ups. What these stupid juries think is of no consequence.


105 posted on 10/18/2022 6:14:45 PM PDT by popdonnelly (All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revel

I told everyone when he was appointed he is part of the coverup. And that he’d lose every case he brings.

Do you really think Biden and Garland would let him continue if he wasn’t in on the coverup?


106 posted on 10/18/2022 6:17:20 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
Durham is just warming up.

Yeah he has cases against much bigger fish that he'll bring to trial to be acquitted.

107 posted on 10/18/2022 6:33:51 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

In that scenario you start by pursuing the bottom level players and work your way up. He’s gotten one conviction which led to a light sentence. What do you think he’s gotten from the people he’s investigated that will lead to anyone higher up?


108 posted on 10/18/2022 6:40:25 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Durham’s case was so weak that they didn’t even put up a defense.


109 posted on 10/18/2022 7:29:32 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

yup, as unexpected as the sun rising in the east


110 posted on 10/18/2022 8:32:17 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Trust The Plan.


111 posted on 10/18/2022 11:27:24 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Sounds like Durham used the same absurd strategy he used in the first false statement trial - claiming that the FBI was duped.

LOL - the FBI created the Russia Hoax!

Durham was not going to get a conviction on any charge he filed in Washington D.C. or northern Virginia.

Regardless, Durham had an opportunity to tear off the FBI's bogus facade of probity and honor, and he decided to do nothing.

112 posted on 10/18/2022 11:57:07 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Proof!! Please!!


113 posted on 10/19/2022 2:16:23 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Never will dems get a bad decision anywhere in the DC area, probably the entire northeast.


114 posted on 10/19/2022 2:39:31 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

They were saying on Fox yesterday that the Judge didn’t allow of the evidence to be heard. Then he threw out the charge about talking to someone because it was via email and Judge felt that was consider talking about it if its in an email. Dechanko defense brought that up to Judge and he went with it.

FBI agents asked Dechanko if he talked with so and so. vs saying did you have any communications with so and so.

So saying something in an email about an an item, issue, etc is now not considered talking about it. How stupid of an argument for a Judge to go along with.


115 posted on 10/19/2022 6:43:08 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Long ladder with short rungs. FBI corruption realized as justice slowly ensnares them and the puppeteers.


116 posted on 10/19/2022 9:34:23 AM PDT by Broker (Truth & Transparency & Equal Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I wish we conservatives would march in the streets and yell that but then we all have jobs...


117 posted on 10/19/2022 10:57:24 PM PDT by buffyt (There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved. Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson