Posted on 09/22/2022 7:52:22 AM PDT by Red Badger
En banc ruling, Trump should request a move for a full court ruling.
I believe Justice Thomas oversees this circuit, so they had best be acting in conformance with the law, or he will likely step in.
One Obama judge spoils the whole panel.
$15,000 needed .. Receipts & Pledges to-date: $65,085
81%
WOO HOO!! We’re now over 81%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.
7 DAYS LEFT........
https://freerepublic.com/donate/
Bring it to the Supreme Court. At its heart are many vital Constitutional questions that need to be answered.
Two Trump judges were part of the decision.
Meh. The world is going to end on September 24th anyway. 😉
https://www.indy100.com/viral/qanon-september-24-the-simpsons
Etc.
There are also some fairly “legit” sources iscussing economic stuff coming down the pike at the end of September. Lots of talk about the Jewish new year, etc. as well.
The thing I like about this sort of prediction is you don’t have to wait long to find out if it’s true. 😁
“Dearie also suggested Trump’s attorneys would not be receiving security clearance in the near term, which would also limit their ability to review the documents of concern.”
They’re going to have to be given the clearances, or the feds won’t be able to make any prosecution based on any of those documents they are pinning their hopes on.
When Trump returns we need a law that if a reviewing appeals panel is reversed by a higher court, the appellate judges pay the attorney fees for the petitioner’s appeals from their salaries.
This whole fake “investigation” sure seems on-sided and stacked against the accused. In a sane legal system, it would void all charges.
For all the complaints about this legal process, the judge is not wrong here. If you go to court and want to press a legal point, you're going to have to back it up.
The "classification" question was never the real issue here. The bigger question involves documents that should be subject to Donald Trump's legal protections as a U.S. citizen (covered by lawyer-client privilege, for example).
Yeah, I’ve been hearing about “prophesies” brewing as well. Maybe we’re just not paying attention when they are fulfilled?
Per para. 2, the suggestion that Trump should try to make this the pivotal issue in the midterms.
That’s a swell idea. At least 35% of the voters hate the guy’s guts. We should take the attention off the disastrous administration and try to get those people to vote for us based on the injustice done to someone they loathe. That’s a pretty aggressive move in the direction of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
I thought Trump declassified everything?
By the still standing executive order of his most exalted excellency Barack Obama:
“Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations.
(a) In no case shall information be classified,
continue to be maintained as classified,
or fail to be declassified in order to:
(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3) restrain competition; or
(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.”
“Part 3 - Declassification and Downgrading
Sec. 3.1. Authority for Declassification.
(a) Information shall be declassified as soon as it no longer meets the standards for classification under this order.
(b) Information shall be declassified or downgraded by:
(1) the official who authorized the original classification, if that official is still serving in the same position and has original classification authority;
(2) the originator’s current successor in function, if that individual has original classification authority;
(3) a supervisory official of either the originator or his or her successor in function, if the supervisory official has original classification authority;”
“Sec. 3.2. Transferred Records.
(a) In the case of classified records transferred in conjunction with a transfer of functions, and not merely for storage purposes, the receiving agency shall be deemed to be the originating agency for purposes of this order.”
“Part 4 - Safeguarding
Sec. 4.1. General Restrictions on Access.
(a) A person may have access to classified information provided that:
(1) a favorable determination of eligibility for access has been made by an agency head or the agency head’s designee;
(2) the person has signed an approved nondisclosure agreement; and
(3) the person has a need to know the information
....
(d) Classified information may not be removed from official premises without proper authorization.
(e) Persons authorized to disseminate classified information outside the executive branch shall ensure the protection of the information in a manner equivalent to that provided within the executive branch.”
“Sec. 4.2 Distribution Controls.
(a) The head of each agency shall establish procedures in accordance with applicable law and consistent with directives issued pursuant to this order to ensure that classified information is accessible to the maximum extent possible by individuals who meet the criteria set forth in section 4.1(a) of this order.”
https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html
Well, I probably should not have brought it up in this thread, but...
I just heard about this stuff yesterday, so I can just see what happens between now and the end of the month. We’re already prepared as we can be. We started over a decade ago, not due to any prophesy, but simply by “recognizing the signs”, as we are instructed. And this applies not only to “his coming”, but any “big events”. It’s why the smart Jews left Germany in the mid-30’s, while they still could. The recognized the signs.
The September 24 thing was started by a member of the German Bundestag.
Then they said he was referring to February 24, the day Russia invaded Ukraine.
But why was he talking in the future tense if that were the case? February is behind us.
My only grandson turns 12 on September 24th, so yeah, it’s a special day.
You knew this was coming. This is the way the democratic party operates. They suppress all opposing evidence always! They want no opposition ever.
Let us see the Special Master’s evidence. Let us hear what he has to say so we can make up our own minds. The opposition to it just proves that the FBI and the DOJ are biased toward the democrats. They do not want it to be known that there was nothing scary found in what they took from Mar-a-Lago. It would be even more proof that it was a democratic scheme to influence the November midterm election. The evidence against the FBI and DOJ is mounting and obvious as they fight against the Special Master’s evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.