Indictments are not convictions.
Notice the ‘significantly expanded gun rights’ propaganda? SCOTUS actually slapped down some of the infringement that government is explicitly prohibited from doing.
Kammy, the Joek and their puppeteers all need diaper changes after hearing this bit of news.
It will be used as a condition of bail? Well, at least for white Christians.
misuse of firearms in criminal acts should demand increased penalties, perhaps life without parole, but once time is served, a constitutional right cannot be denied.
Don’t count on the 4473 dropping that question any time soon.
Great Vid...Language Warning..
But VID is SPOT ON!!!!
What about under indictment for a state law?
Anything that blows up the Dim heads is fine with me.
Excellent!
It’s about time. Previously, one ‘tax fraud’ conviction (e.g., author Dale Brown), and you couldn’t own any modern firearms (>1895) ever again. This is nonsense. If a person cannot be trusted with firearms without a custodian, leave them in jail.
Here is a nice old Texas case...
Jennings v. State, 5 Tex. Crim. App. 298, at 300-01 (1878).
“We believe that portion of the act which provides that, in case of conviction, the defendant shall forfeit to the county the weapon or weapons so found on or about his person is not within the scope of legislative authority. * * * One of his most sacred rights is that of having arms for his own defence and that of the State. This right is one of the surest safeguards of liberty and self-preservation.”
No. It significantly restored Second Amendment rights.