Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ivermectin reduces COVID death risk by 92%, peer-reviewed study finds
The Blaze ^ | September 3, 2022 | Paul Sacca

Posted on 09/10/2022 9:49:07 AM PDT by Twotone

A new peer-reviewed study found that regular use of ivermectin reduced the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 92%.

The large study was conducted by Flávio A. Cadegiani, MD, MSc, PhD. Cadegiani is a board-certified endocrinologist with a master's degree and doctorate degree in clinical endocrinology.

The peer-reviewed study was published on Wednesday by the online medical journal Cureus. The study was conducted on a strictly controlled population of 88,012 people from the city of Itajaí in Brazil.

Individuals who used ivermectin as prophylaxis or took the medication before being infected by COVID experienced significant reductions in death and hospitalization.

According to the study, those who took ivermectin regularly had a 92% reduction in their COVID death risk compared to non-users and 84% less than irregular users.

"The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users," the study stated.

The impressive reduction for regular ivermectin users was evident despite the regular users being at a higher risk for COVID deaths. The regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appleflavor; cadegiani; covid; covidinfo; cureus; dewormer; horsepaste; ilikeappleflavor; ivermectin; research
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: gas_dr

Naw, some other dude was asking about your opinion on something. You hadn’t responded yet so I took some liberty.

Hope you enjoyed the game, although football is certainly not in the common sense 101 syllabus.


61 posted on 09/11/2022 6:24:48 AM PDT by Sarcazmo ("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

We mixed the paste with applesauce. No residual taste at all.


62 posted on 09/11/2022 7:56:45 AM PDT by OriginalChristian (The end of the American Republic as founded, began when the first Career Politician was elected...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bray

Define late stages
What were the markers if inflammation
I’ll take you at your word as to you have used it on 30 people. If you had that data I would assume a publication forthcoming.


63 posted on 09/11/2022 8:57:29 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
So I have had the opportunity to take a deeper dive into the article and the journal. Here are the pros and cons. As I have objectively looked at this article as per my training I ask that needless personal attacks be left out and Of someone disagrees then please let’s talk about the issue at hand

First. The journal. It is not peer-reviewed. Here is the exact statement as to the journal and what it does from the journal website itself: Cureus is a signer of DORA – the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment – and does not promote the use of journal impact factors. We instead use article-level metrics such as reads, downloads and citations. Cureus also encourages all readers to submit an SIQ (Scholarly Impact Quotient) score for each article. SIQ is our unique post-publication rating that assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. As such there is no apparent process as to being published and any significant questions on the article are judged by clicks and data generated from open access crowd source funded platform. This is a serious issue with this article.

In terms did the methodology and the study itself. It is only for prophylaxis. It is prospective observational so no blinding no placebo. They played a little fast and loose with exclusions and also excluded those not infected. It is unclear but likely there were a large percentage of asymptomatic immune from infection so there is a question as to the data from that standpoint.

They talk about a chi squared regression plot. It didn’t see it. I may have just missed it but that is important data point. Additionally, there discussion on assignments the variable dose users doesn’t seem all that robust. There are some stretches in this analysis.

Finally the period of analysis did not see a stable disease pattern from the virus and the numbers of cases. The next step would be a RCP doubly blind to see if there is a prophylaxis affect.

As some above on this thread are doing, this study CANNOT be extrapolated to efficacy of acute illness treatment.

64 posted on 09/11/2022 10:04:59 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

You are the biggest quack in America and you have supported Fauxi since the beginning. We followed the Frontline Doctors who have cured thousands with ivermectin. You do realize the CDC is now admitting it works so you may have to change your mind Dr gasbag.


65 posted on 09/11/2022 10:06:50 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

Note you changed cured with used, how Dr Fauxi of you. You have no idea what you are talking about.


66 posted on 09/11/2022 10:08:13 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

We think Ivermectin worked for my husband, who never got COVID. Did not touch my COVID at all, boy was I sick.


67 posted on 09/11/2022 10:13:44 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Your exact words in post 27 “but it does work well for late stages too”.

So I asked a naturally scientific question in which I accepted that your are actually treating the disease and asked for the data points you are using for late disease. I am further asking what lab testing you have to define it. I am happy to have a factual and data driven conversation. But you respond on who Fauci of me without even bothering to answer the question.

So it appears to me that by your own answer to your own words you are full of crap. It was your words genius. Not mine.


68 posted on 09/11/2022 10:15:41 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bray

You later state in your own words we have cured 30 people in the late stages some of whom where in the hospital. So of your 30 it appears not all were late stage.

Secondly I asked a simple question. What is late stage. How do you define it in your practice. I know full what what late state really means and my guess is you are equally not quantifying it. How are you testing?

Please instead of insulting me I would love to hear the data points you are using. I would love for you to be correct but clearly by the lack of excitement and urgency by most of the rest of the practice no world your results are either not because of IVM of bear a detailed look at so the word can be spread.

But it appears all you have are insults and innuendo.


69 posted on 09/11/2022 10:20:35 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bray

Point to single post where I have supported Fauci. And when you site frontline doctors are you speaking of the American Front Line Doctors? A simple yes or no will suffice


70 posted on 09/11/2022 10:23:20 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
Many many months ago, I woke up about 3:00 in the morning, with a slight fever, minor sore throat. I, immediately, started the Zelenko protocol. I had Ivermectin tablets, so I used that, along with, the other components, in the protocol.

By the next morning, I already felt better and by the next day, was, pretty much over it. Had a test done, because I had doctor's appointments coming up and it was Covid.

Ivermectin and the rest of the protocol, seemed to have worked.

71 posted on 09/11/2022 10:27:51 AM PDT by Ez2BRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

You take it with zinc, right?

Cured me and son in 3 hours.


72 posted on 09/11/2022 10:32:22 AM PDT by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
It’s published in an “open access” journal, not one of the traditional peer reviewed journals.

Isn't that like saying it was published in the New York Post and not the New York Times?

The question is whether it legitimately peer-reviewed or not?

-PJ

73 posted on 09/11/2022 10:34:16 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I have had a cold for a few days and just tested positive for Covid. 64 years old, vaxxed and one booster, on a prophylaxis. I supposed there is nothing they do now. I have some antibiotics squirreled away in case of pneumonia.


74 posted on 09/11/2022 4:00:32 PM PDT by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Ivermectin is like Glucosomine. It either works or it doesn’t.


75 posted on 09/11/2022 4:01:38 PM PDT by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

If you can get Ivermectin, I’d start taking it. I read that Fenbendazole has similar properties & have started taking it as a prophylactic. The sooner these are used, the better.


76 posted on 09/11/2022 4:06:05 PM PDT by Twotone (While one may vote oneself into socialism one has to shoot oneself out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Twotone; nickcarraway; ransomnote; Jane Long
Have you heard anything relating to this...

WHAT THE ACTUAL ****

Asterisks mine.

You’re never going to guess who funded Together trial which concluded ivermectin was ineffective to treat COVID: Democrat donor Sam Bankman-Fried’s bankrupt scam of a company FTX. Oh and Sam’s brother is the director of a non-profit called "Guarding Against Pandemics".

77 posted on 11/15/2022 2:36:49 PM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

The collusion of leftist billionaires to deliberately destroy this country (& everyone in it) is just amazing.


78 posted on 11/15/2022 2:42:58 PM PST by Twotone (While one may vote oneself into socialism one has to shoot oneself out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Unreal.

Thx for the ping and links, as always.


79 posted on 11/15/2022 3:08:31 PM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Update!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-says-telling-people-not-to-take-ivermectin-for-covid-19-was-just-a-recommendation_4873897.html


80 posted on 11/19/2022 2:47:41 PM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson