Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long; xzins; ransomnote; Cathi; metmom; grey_whiskers; bagster; Enlightened1; cgbg; ...
Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?

From the British Medical Journal

23 posted on 08/30/2022 7:16:05 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers; Jane Long; ransomnote
From the link…..

Research authorities insisted that fraud was rare, didn’t matter because science was self-correcting, and that no patients had suffered because of scientific fraud. All those reasons for not taking research fraud seriously have proved to be false, and, 40 years on from Lock’s concerns, we are realising that the problem is huge, the system encourages fraud, and we have no adequate way to respond.

What an indictment of “scientific research.”

And the welfare of the patient and potential for harm done to actual individuals as a result of this fraud, doesn’t even seem to be on their radar. They simply claim, with no valid basis that I can see, that no patients had suffered due to the fraud. How the heck do they know????

They can’t.

25 posted on 08/30/2022 8:23:19 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson