Posted on 08/26/2022 7:57:14 PM PDT by HogsBreath
A recently released FBI affidavit related to the Mar-a-Lago search spells trouble for Trump. "Donald Trump will be indicted in the classified documents matter," a national security lawyer said. The affidavit also throws a wrench into Trump's claim of innocence because "it was all declassified."
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
What’s that? You say the noose is tightening?
Why not indict him, there certainly isn’t any penalties for trying to convict an innocent person. Besides, you probably couldn’t find 12 juror’s in all of DC that would give Trump a fair trial. Dems will eat this up!
Oh jeez, more Pulitzer dreamers.
“ local high school, Camila went to the American University and graduated with a degree in Broadcast Journalism. At college, She was the president of the Toastmasters Club American University Chapter for a year.
At the age of 27, she has a great body with a height of 5…”
Wow. I thought. To be a staff writer at BI one had to have a good education
I had people over for a kids chicken nugget meal tonight with exponentially more education than that.
Ok. Now I get it
BI is a Leftwing rag
BI=BS
Yeah; indict the best President in modern history for a clerical error that you just stole the election from in 2020. That’ll go over real big with the 100M+ that voted for him.
Can’t fix that level of stupid. Must be some kind record low.
BI has no credibility.
In Washington D.C Trump will be convicted of anything put before a jury.
Hey! It Does! :
T----- -------- ----------- ----- ----- ----
---- --- ---- -----r. ---- ---- ---- --- -----.
---- ---- --- ------ --- - ----- o- --- ------- ---- -----
--u ------ ----b-- --------- --- ---- --------- -- ----------.
l------ --- --e ------.
This is an issue for the Govt
This case has unusual precedents. Comey is on record explaining why Hillary and Huma Abedin should not be charged IN PAINSTAKING DETAIL.
In fact, Comey said, in both cases, Criminal Intent was necessary to be charged.
Comey, for Huma too, goes down the list of violations - and then says there was no Criminal Intent there, so there wouldn’t be any charges.
Cases usually have Judicial Rulings as precedents, but this case is highly unusual because the charging decisions and the basis behind those non-charges have been delineated under oath to Congress. And the Law hasn’t changed.
One of the tenets of Law is it shouldn’t be arbitrary and capricious.
Camila: “Let’s forget the indictment. I just want to watch them pour molten lead down his throat. No, no, I’ve got it! Scaphism! I want to see him eaten alive by insects over several weeks!”
And it took three of them to do that.
If they did that and let clintons, bidens, obamas alone... the anger in normally quiet patriots..
Who do you think is going to call up enough troops, munitions,and civil support even to dream of waging war?
How many companies did you muster on June 6th?
So tell me if the country splits and war breaks out, which it may not break out, but if it does are you going to fight for the Feds?
Who do you think is going to call up enough troops, munitions,and civil support even to dream of waging war?
How many companies did you muster on June 6th?
Bull shirt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.