Posted on 08/11/2022 2:26:03 PM PDT by NoLibZone
A person close to the Trump family suggested the FBI may have planted “listening devices” during a raid targeting former President Donald Trump’s Florida residence earlier this week.
Lawyers for the former president previously said that FBI agents would not allow Trump’s team to observe or supervise their search of Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach. One lawyer, Lindsey Halligan, told Fox News on Thursday that agents are believed to have searched Trump’s bedroom, office, and a storage room.
Because the FBI allegedly “didn’t allow anybody to supervise what they were doing, and they specifically requested to turn off the security cameras,” Kimbery Guilfoyle, Donald Trump Jr.’s fiancée and an advisor to the former president’s 2020 campaign, told Newsmax. “Why? Because they didn’t want to be caught with what they were doing. How do you know there weren’t listening devices planted or evidence planted there?
“It’s something that has to be investigated and checked out, and we want to see the affidavit and what was their probable cause to be able to go in there and break into the president’s home,” she added. For her claim, Guilfoyle did not provide evidence.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Exactly. Even re-doing the rooms that were violated or building a new addition, he could NEVER trust that there were not privacy breaches.
That is a good point. Trump should be entitled to accurate chain of custody evidence, and it could not be provided, based on the reports of how the raid was conducted.
I guess this is what we can now expect from the FB(KGB)I.
Hey Barrack, you want anything?
I remember that episode. Maybe President Trump has something to do with the Norden Bombsight.
At least throw out all the food, destroy any open bottles etc...
I suppose that the FIB’s eavesdrop of choice for one’s conversations is to simply gain access to the microphone in your cellphone or computer.
That was Helga, or Hilda.
Yes you're right, I should have sourced the info. Thanks.
That would explain why the DOJ insisted that the security cameras be turned off during the raid. Sounds more like communist Soviet Union more every day.
Bingo...Years ago all the feds wanted were everyone’s fingerprints. Now all they want are cell phone numbers.
With that in mind how could the FBI goons have been given free reign in the residence without being shadowed by at least one Secret Service agent? If that happened that would be a huge violation of Federal law. If it didn't get those agents under oath!
I am all in for wild speculation on what the FBI may or may not have done while inside President Trump’s home. It undermines any claim that FBI may make now are in the future.
Even if they found (or created) a “smoking gun” the procurement of that evidences is so tainted it would never be seen in a (real) court of law.
My guess is that they never planned on going to any court besides the court of public opinion, and if that is the case the only guilty party in all these is the FBI.
Absolutely. I am sure they will.
She doesn’t need evidence. Attack, attack, attack!
Time to ask Wray under oath if the FBI or its surrogates installed any electronic surveillance devices. Perjury trap.
Good idea.
Yep. From Stalin, to Hitler, to Mao, to Pol Pot, to name the leader board.
Listening devices? Heck how about evidence!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.