Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA wants to put a nuclear reactor on the MOON by 2030: US space agency shortlists three design concepts that could turn Earth's satellite into an orbiting power station
dailymail.co.uk/ ^ | 6/23/2022 | SAM TONKIN FOR MAILONLINE

Posted on 06/24/2022 7:04:32 AM PDT by bitt

US space agency has announced plans to put nuclear reactor on moon by 2030

It is part of a vision to turn Earth's only natural satellite into orbiting fuel station

NASA has shortlisted three concepts for 40-kilowatt class fission power system

The nuclear reactor is planned to last at least 10 years in the lunar environment

NASA has announced plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030 as part of a vision to turn the lunar body into an orbiting power station.

The US space agency has chosen three design concept proposals for a fission power system that could be ready to launch by the end of the decade.

It would then be tested by astronauts returning to the lunar surface under the new Artemis programme, which will see the first woman and 13th man land on the moon by 2025.

The plan is for the 40-kilowatt class fission power system to last at least 10 years in the lunar environment, with the hope that it could one day support a permanent human presence on the moon, as well as support manned missions to Mars and beyond.

If NASA is to build a base on the lunar surface, one of the major problems to solve will be how such a proposed settlement would be powered.

Solar panels are great for powering rovers, but a human base would need a continuous and reliable source of power.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: moon; nasa; nuclearreactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2022 7:04:32 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

what could go wrong? /s


2 posted on 06/24/2022 7:05:00 AM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thats gonna take a LONG extension cord for it to be useful!


3 posted on 06/24/2022 7:05:34 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Is the old TV show ‘Space:1999’ about to become reality?


4 posted on 06/24/2022 7:08:19 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

A would bet everything this doesn’t happen via NASA by 2030.


5 posted on 06/24/2022 7:08:26 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

6 posted on 06/24/2022 7:08:43 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Where is Biden leading us and what's with the hand basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Moonbase boom.jpg
7 posted on 06/24/2022 7:09:07 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
Hey, one problem at a time. First you build it then you worry about getting the power to earth.

/s

8 posted on 06/24/2022 7:10:31 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (The problem today: people are more concerned about feelings than responsibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

They’re going to destroy the ecology of the moon! Oh, wait.


9 posted on 06/24/2022 7:11:38 AM PDT by Roadrunner383 (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
NASA wants to put a nuclear reactor on the MOON by 2030

Leave it in NASAs hands and it won't be in place until 2040 or beyond. Outsource it to private industry and it'll be ready before 2030.

10 posted on 06/24/2022 7:11:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Ummm. Long extension cord. Or, is it a EV charging station for space travel, oh, wait, that’s not in the plan.

Maybe the Dems will migrate to the moon and live in peace harmony evermore.....and leave us alone?


11 posted on 06/24/2022 7:12:46 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
A would bet everything this doesn’t happen via NASA by 2030.

NASA will spend the next seven years trying to figure out if the first woman on the moon should be black or transgender.

12 posted on 06/24/2022 7:13:03 AM PDT by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Why would they need electrical power on the moon? Red lights so airplanes don’t accidentally run into it? 24/7 radio station for LGBTQEIEIO propaganda because their mission’s been redefined as outreach?


13 posted on 06/24/2022 7:13:12 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

First they have to workout how to make it as Diverse as possible


14 posted on 06/24/2022 7:13:18 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Dang. They wanna put electric car charging stations everywhere.


15 posted on 06/24/2022 7:13:32 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Expect the anti-nuclear know-nothings to start their pearl clutching in 3...2...1.

At least China and India will have no qualms about opening up the moon for commercial advantage.
16 posted on 06/24/2022 7:13:34 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

That’s far closer to reality than this proposition…


17 posted on 06/24/2022 7:13:51 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: bitt

Only trans muslim peoples of color will build it. Will be done in no time!


19 posted on 06/24/2022 7:15:35 AM PDT by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
NASA has shortlisted three concepts for 40-kilowatt class fission power system

Never heard of such a small reactor. How much juice would it generate?

Search results: "enough to continuously run 30 households for ten years."

Tiny. I mean tiny.

Still, I bet the whole world gets its pantaloons in a knot over this proposal.

20 posted on 06/24/2022 7:17:16 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson