Skip to comments.
NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION,
INC., ET AL. v. BRUEN, SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW
YORK STATE POLICE, ET AL.
SCOTUS ^
| 6/23/22
| Clarence Thomas
Posted on 06/23/2022 7:41:59 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
Ruling in favor of guns outside the home, big win for the 2nd amendment
(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
Nice opinion by Thomas
1
posted on
06/23/2022 7:41:59 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
2
posted on
06/23/2022 7:42:41 AM PDT
by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: 1Old Pro
The court holds that New York’s “proper-cause” requirement to obtain a concealed-carry license violates the Constitution by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense.
3
posted on
06/23/2022 7:43:11 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: God luvs America
4
posted on
06/23/2022 7:43:20 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: God luvs America
To: God luvs America
The usual. Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer dissenting.
6
posted on
06/23/2022 7:43:47 AM PDT
by
CFW
To: 1Old Pro
7
posted on
06/23/2022 7:43:50 AM PDT
by
georgiarat
(We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it. William Faulkner )
To: TallahasseeConservative
8
posted on
06/23/2022 7:44:28 AM PDT
by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: georgiarat
Great day for our constitution.
9
posted on
06/23/2022 7:44:35 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
The way I read the ruling, it sounds like it goes much farther than just the New York rule. It says individuals have a constitutional right to self defense with a gun outside the home. That would seem to me to strike down pretty much every restriction or licensing scheme for concealed carry nationwide.
10
posted on
06/23/2022 7:45:00 AM PDT
by
apillar
To: 1Old Pro
Supreme Court says Second Amendment guarantees right to carry guns in public
The ruling expands upon a 2008 decision that said the Second Amendment safeguards a person’s right to possess firearms at home for self-protection.
6-3 ruling. I am shocked Roberts went with the right, but then he already had cover since it would have been 5-4. This is Roberts’s MO. He goes far left when he is the 5-4 swing vote, but when the conservatives have a 5-4 without him, then he votes with them 6-3 to give himself cover and pretend to be conservative.
Scumbag.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-says-second-amendment-guarantees-right-carry-guns-public-rcna17721
11
posted on
06/23/2022 7:45:56 AM PDT
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
To: apillar
it sounds like it goes much farther than just the New York rule. It says individuals have a constitutional right to self defense with a gun outside the home. Could be, can't wait for the scholars to comment on it. This is pretty much just breaking.
12
posted on
06/23/2022 7:46:01 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
The major decision of the day. The Roe overturn will have to wait till next week.
To: 1Old Pro
14
posted on
06/23/2022 7:47:37 AM PDT
by
Rusty0604
(" When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." -Ronald Reagan)
To: DoodleDawg
The major decision of the day. The Roe overturn will have to wait till next week.Yep, both are big ones and both good go the way of proper interpretation of the constitution.
15
posted on
06/23/2022 7:48:13 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
Amen. Now waiting for Dobbs.
16
posted on
06/23/2022 7:48:50 AM PDT
by
NoKoolAidforMe
(Silence in the face of evil, is itself evil. Dietrich Bonhoeffer)
To: Rusty0604
Big Win!Yes, I'm anxious to hear a interpretation of the anticipated ripple effect.
17
posted on
06/23/2022 7:49:13 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
It sounds like they just eliminated the need for a CCW permit for the 25 states that still required them
18
posted on
06/23/2022 7:51:00 AM PDT
by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: 1Old Pro
But now criminals will have guns! City streets won’t be safe!
oh wait.....................
19
posted on
06/23/2022 7:51:11 AM PDT
by
wny
To: 1Old Pro
I’m reasonably certain there’s no connection, but the left may not have chosen the opportune moment to harass the justices at their homes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson