NeverTrumper Rep Nancy Mace Runs a ‘Raffensperger Special’ in Primary Race – Add Her to List of Anti-Trump Candidates with Improbable Primary Wins

Gateway Pundit ^ | June 15, 2022 | Joe Hoft

[Perseverando]

Last night another shocking win occurred in the GOP primaries. GOP Representative and incumbent, Nancy Mace won her primary in South Carolina.

Nancy Mace is a huge NeverTrumper who President Trump was vocal about replacing.

When impossible election results occur, the 2020 Election taught us that they probably were impossible.

America sat back and saw Joe Biden gather hundreds of thousands of votes after the polling centers were closed in key swing states across the country. By the next morning Biden was able to steal multiple states where President Trump was way ahead the night before. President Trump even warned us this would happen.

Instead, the election was stolen and President Trump nailed it:

“We don’t want then to find any ballots at 4 o’clock in the morning and add them to the list.”

But that is exactly what happened. Big Media remained silent on the steal. Big Tech kicked anyone off their platforms who mentioned the steal, including the President. Politicians from both parties labeled President Trump a sore loser and the election was stolen.

Next came the 2022 GOP primaries. Again we see massive corruption in Georgia. The corrupt governor and Secretary of State, Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger, were hated. Yet, despite President Trump-backing two competitive candidates in these races, the anti-Trumpers won.

[moonhawk]

Not everyone missing a drawl is blue.

[HamiltonJay]

I don’t agree with open primaries and think they are stupid, but if the state is set up that way, then the state is set up that way... that’s not fraud.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Someone needs to go third party to beat these people.

[Hostage]

Yes, GOP country clubbers have definitely bought into the rig apparatus, not even a doubt. Posted here two weeks back how Raffensperger was reupped as primary candidate by crossovers (confirmed by lefty rag AJC) and then recently, massive numbers of fake ballots.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4066575/posts

Yes, GOP uniparty is joined at the hip with Democrats in “electioneering.”

[bankwalker]

but it is stupid on the part of Republicans.

I think it is dictated by state election law ... I could be wrong ...

[Freee-dame]

And some of these states have Republican majority state legislatures. I used to wonder how the Republican Party could be so stupid. Once I realized they were actually the party of collusion as well as stupid, I stopped wondering.

[Hostage]

> “Party of Collusion”

Apt.

[Brilliant]

The reason why Trumps candidates are losing is simple. His supporters don’t trust the system and therefore see no point in voting. Happened in Georgia too, both in the Senate race and in the primaries.

[FLT-bird]

Vote for the Democrat ahead of her in November.

[DMD13]

One way we can get rid of Mace is to vote third party. In two years, we can kick the Democrat out.

[arthurus]

SC and GA have election systems preloaded from the top, Republicans working for Democrats..

[upchuck]

Thanks for the ping Perseverando.

Don't forget: SC Primary Runoff Tues, June 28. Polls open 7A-7P

Everything you need to know about the primaries and election: The Green Papers: South Carolina 2022 General Election. Scroll down.

South Carolina Ping   

If you'd like to be on or off the South Carolina ping list, just click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.

[Lurkinanloomin]

South Carolina loves their Bush League Republicans.

It’s almost all they elect.

[DeplorablePaul]

Yes. I live in (SC 1) We should sacrifice the seat. We don’t need back stabbing, rat faced Mace.

[Lurkinanloomin]

SC and GA have election systems preloaded from the top, Republicans working for Democrats..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Exactly right.

Bush League Republicans = Assistant Democrats

[mcjordansc]

If we are going to make arguments about election results we have to be smart while presenting them. First, SC has a very good voting system. The ExpressVote system gives a voter a chance to verify his/her ballot before it is scanned. The paper ballot is kept in a locked box for verification if necessary.

Regarding Biden receiving 237K more votes than Obama in 2008, you should expect that. The state grew in population by more than 600K in that same time frame. Most of the population growth was voting-age people moving into the state.

Trump’s margin of victory in 2020 was 90K votes more than Romney’s in 2008.

To paraphrase St Augustine, you cannot talk nonsense on some things and expect anyone to believe any of your comments.

[kiryandil]

To paraphrase St Augustine, you cannot talk nonsense on some things and expect anyone to believe any of your comments.

While you're cleverly vote-splaining things to me, you might want to explain this table, which compares the Hillary 2016 changes from Obama 2008 to the Biden 2020 changes from Obama 2008.

We'll note that 2016 was 8 years after Obama, whereas 2020 was only 4 years after 2016. The "explosion" in Democrat "voting" came in 4 years. We can examine the population increases in the 2010 Census and 2020 Census to arrive at an average figure per year.

As you noted, the state of South Carolina grew in population by more than 600K in the time frame we're talking about.

Other reference points we want to take into account are the US senatorial elections in South Carolina [2020/2016/2014/2010/2008]. The various US House races can also impact the presidential election numbers, but I usually examine those last.

The purple row on the table identifies where the "fortified voting" starts falling off to normal turnout.

	Obama	Hillary	p	Obama	Biden
	minus	div	o	minus	div
	Hillary	Obama	p	Biden	Obama		population
Greenville	-3,597	105%	1	-32,144	145%		533,834
Richland	-2,344	102%	2	-26,914	125%		418,307
Charleston	-6,601	108%	3	-38,787	147%		413,024
Horry	-531	101%	4	-20,301	152%		365,579
Spartanburg	1,635	96%	5	-11,294	127%		335,864
Lexington	-1,927	106%	6	-15,998	148%		300,137
York	-3,675	110%	7	-21,090	156%		288,595
Berkeley	-2,950	111%	8	-17,468	163%		236,701
Anderson	3,035	87%	9	-3,037	113%		206,908
Beaufort	-1,742	106%	10	-13,023	143%		191,748
Aiken	646	98%	11	-6,174	124%		170,776
Dorchester	-2,249	110%	12	-12,018	155%		163,327
Florence	1,302	95%	13	-3,141	111%		136,504
Pickens	1,337	89%	14	-1,954	117%		132,229
Sumter	1,384	95%	15	-1,948	108%		104,758
Lancaster	-1,673	114%	16	-6,798	156%		100,336
Orangeburg	945	97%	17	-32	100%		82,962
Oconee	1,483	84%	18	-933	110%		79,203
Greenwood	1,637	87%	19	203	98%		69,241
Laurens	1,689	84%	20	419	96%		67,803
Kershaw	896	92%	21	-1,473	113%		66,130
Georgetown	889	94%	22	-1,623	111%		63,921
Darlington	617	96%	23	-715	105%		62,755
Cherokee	1,123	84%	24	232	97%		56,052
Chesterfield	984	87%	25	411	95%		43,268
Colleton	989	89%	26	14	100%		38,462
Newberry	491	93%	27	-250	104%		37,996
Chester	899	88%	28	537	93%		32,209
Clarendon	941	89%	29	423	95%		31,024
Williamsburg	1,326	88%	30	990	91%		30,484
Jasper	-567	111%	31	-1,796	133%		30,324
Marion	1,039	89%	32	736	92%		28,784
Dillon	1,574	79%	33	972	87%		28,087
Union	1,206	80%	34	1,000	83%		27,016
Marlboro	840	88%	35	504	93%		26,382
Edgefield	584	88%	36	122	98%		26,153
Abbeville	852	81%	37	492	89%		24,299
Fairfield	646	91%	38	209	97%		20,690
Barnwell	531	89%	39	211	96%		20,580
Saluda	510	85%	40	360	89%		18,821
Hampton	646	89%	41	493	92%		18,180
Lee	761	87%	42	631	89%		16,280
Calhoun	397	90%	43	65	98%		14,165
Bamberg	528	88%	44	416	91%		13,189
McCormick	276	90%	45	68	98%		9,760
Allendale	294	90%	46	311	90%		7,858

[kiryandil]

You'll note the haphazard increases for Hillary over Obama, as compared to the machine-like Biden increases over Obama 2008.

My benchmark for almost certain vote fraud is an increase over Obama 2008 of about 108%.

Now, in South Carolina, you DO have to take the population increases into account, so we can push the benchmark up to a 110-112% increase for laughs.

This is something that can be addressed by drilling down later, after you've identified The Usual Suspect Counties.

Another point to address is the outlier counties, highlighted in light greenish-blue [Georgetown, Jasper and Kershaw].

Without looking at a map [which is one of the keys to understanding the Democrat vote fraud machine], I can guess that these counties have one of two things true about them:

1. They're embedded in a group of fraud counties [within an hour's driving distance of what I call a central command-and-control county], or

2. They are by themselves a Democrat-dominated county, with a Democrat machine in place to "fortify" the "vote".

Now, I don't know much about South Carolina, so perhaps you can add some comments about the power structures related to those particular counties.

One great visual aid for understanding my spreadsheets and tables is printing out a state map with the counties, then plotting on the map the Joe Biden 2020 percentages where he annihilated Obama's 2008 record turnout.

You can easily see the command-and-control counties on that map.

[kiryandil]

Trump’s margin of victory in 2020 was 90K votes more than Romney’s in 2008.

We assume that Trump's numbers aren't cheating, because the DNC Media would be ALL OVER any sniff of Republican rigging [see North Carolina 9th CD, 2018].

Another assumption that I make is that there was no cheating in Obama's record 2008 turnout [obviously not true, but that's a discussion for another day. It's actually the Rosetta Stone to the Democrat vote fraud machine].

Something I noted while doing all 50 states with this scheme was that the Democrats appeared to be "running up the score" in places where they could get away with it - presumably to be able to make the "Muh 81 Million Votes" claim, like they did in 2016, also.

[kiryandil]

Most of the population growth was voting-age people moving into the state.

You have to hit that number with a percentage that takes into account non-voting children.

I'm aware of this because I worked both the 2010 and 2020 Censuses, one of those at a supervisory level.