Replies

If we are going to make arguments about election results we have to be smart while presenting them. First, SC has a very good voting system. The ExpressVote system gives a voter a chance to verify his/her ballot before it is scanned. The paper ballot is kept in a locked box for verification if necessary.

Regarding Biden receiving 237K more votes than Obama in 2008, you should expect that. The state grew in population by more than 600K in that same time frame. Most of the population growth was voting-age people moving into the state.

Trump’s margin of victory in 2020 was 90K votes more than Romney’s in 2008.

To paraphrase St Augustine, you cannot talk nonsense on some things and expect anyone to believe any of your comments.

To paraphrase St Augustine, you cannot talk nonsense on some things and expect anyone to believe any of your comments.

While you're cleverly vote-splaining things to me, you might want to explain this table, which compares the Hillary 2016 changes from Obama 2008 to the Biden 2020 changes from Obama 2008.

We'll note that 2016 was 8 years after Obama, whereas 2020 was only 4 years after 2016. The "explosion" in Democrat "voting" came in 4 years. We can examine the population increases in the 2010 Census and 2020 Census to arrive at an average figure per year.

As you noted, the state of South Carolina grew in population by more than 600K in the time frame we're talking about.

Other reference points we want to take into account are the US senatorial elections in South Carolina [2020/2016/2014/2010/2008]. The various US House races can also impact the presidential election numbers, but I usually examine those last.

The purple row on the table identifies where the "fortified voting" starts falling off to normal turnout.

	Obama	Hillary	p	Obama	Biden
	minus	div	o	minus	div
	Hillary	Obama	p	Biden	Obama	population
Greenville	-3,597	105%	1	-32,144	145%	533,834
Richland	-2,344	102%	2	-26,914	125%	418,307
Charleston	-6,601	108%	3	-38,787	147%	413,024
Horry	-531	101%	4	-20,301	152%	365,579
Spartanburg	1,635	96%	5	-11,294	127%	335,864
Lexington	-1,927	106%	6	-15,998	148%	300,137
York	-3,675	110%	7	-21,090	156%	288,595
Berkeley	-2,950	111%	8	-17,468	163%	236,701
Anderson	3,035	87%	9	-3,037	113%	206,908
Beaufort	-1,742	106%	10	-13,023	143%	191,748
Aiken	646	98%	11	-6,174	124%	170,776
Dorchester	-2,249	110%	12	-12,018	155%	163,327
Florence	1,302	95%	13	-3,141	111%	136,504
Pickens	1,337	89%	14	-1,954	117%	132,229
Sumter	1,384	95%	15	-1,948	108%	104,758
Lancaster	-1,673	114%	16	-6,798	156%	100,336
Orangeburg	945	97%	17	-32	100%	82,962
Oconee	1,483	84%	18	-933	110%	79,203
Greenwood	1,637	87%	19	203	98%	69,241
Laurens	1,689	84%	20	419	96%	67,803
Kershaw	896	92%	21	-1,473	113%	66,130
Georgetown	889	94%	22	-1,623	111%	63,921
Darlington	617	96%	23	-715	105%	62,755
Cherokee	1,123	84%	24	232	97%	56,052
Chesterfield	984	87%	25	411	95%	43,268
Colleton	989	89%	26	14	100%	38,462
Newberry	491	93%	27	-250	104%	37,996
Chester	899	88%	28	537	93%	32,209
Clarendon	941	89%	29	423	95%	31,024
Williamsburg	1,326	88%	30	990	91%	30,484
Jasper	-567	111%	31	-1,796	133%	30,324
Marion	1,039	89%	32	736	92%	28,784
Dillon	1,574	79%	33	972	87%	28,087
Union	1,206	80%	34	1,000	83%	27,016
Marlboro	840	88%	35	504	93%	26,382
Edgefield	584	88%	36	122	98%	26,153
Abbeville	852	81%	37	492	89%	24,299
Fairfield	646	91%	38	209	97%	20,690
Barnwell	531	89%	39	211	96%	20,580
Saluda	510	85%	40	360	89%	18,821
Hampton	646	89%	41	493	92%	18,180
Lee	761	87%	42	631	89%	16,280
Calhoun	397	90%	43	65	98%	14,165
Bamberg	528	88%	44	416	91%	13,189
McCormick	276	90%	45	68	98%	9,760
Allendale	294	90%	46	311	90%	7,858

You'll note the haphazard increases for Hillary over Obama, as compared to the machine-like Biden increases over Obama 2008.

My benchmark for almost certain vote fraud is an increase over Obama 2008 of about 108%.

Now, in South Carolina, you DO have to take the population increases into account, so we can push the benchmark up to a 110-112% increase for laughs.

This is something that can be addressed by drilling down later, after you've identified The Usual Suspect Counties.

Another point to address is the outlier counties, highlighted in light greenish-blue [Georgetown, Jasper and Kershaw].

Without looking at a map [which is one of the keys to understanding the Democrat vote fraud machine], I can guess that these counties have one of two things true about them:

1. They're embedded in a group of fraud counties [within an hour's driving distance of what I call a central command-and-control county], or

2. They are by themselves a Democrat-dominated county, with a Democrat machine in place to "fortify" the "vote".

Now, I don't know much about South Carolina, so perhaps you can add some comments about the power structures related to those particular counties.

One great visual aid for understanding my spreadsheets and tables is printing out a state map with the counties, then plotting on the map the Joe Biden 2020 percentages where he annihilated Obama's 2008 record turnout.

You can easily see the command-and-control counties on that map.

Trump’s margin of victory in 2020 was 90K votes more than Romney’s in 2008.

We assume that Trump's numbers aren't cheating, because the DNC Media would be ALL OVER any sniff of Republican rigging [see North Carolina 9th CD, 2018].

Another assumption that I make is that there was no cheating in Obama's record 2008 turnout [obviously not true, but that's a discussion for another day. It's actually the Rosetta Stone to the Democrat vote fraud machine].

Something I noted while doing all 50 states with this scheme was that the Democrats appeared to be "running up the score" in places where they could get away with it - presumably to be able to make the "Muh 81 Million Votes" claim, like they did in 2016, also.