1. Her background and prior experience are so limited that they are almost embarrassing for someone who is running for a U.S. Senate seat without ever having won an election before in her life. I've interviewed more experienced, competent people for mid-level managerial jobs in the corporate world.
2. I see no evidence that she has any appeal outside her core supporters. (NOTE: This same comment would apply to almost every other GOP candidate in the two statewide races this year in Pennsylvania.)
I told NIKOS1121 I wouldn’t respond to his reasons.
I will likewise withhold response here while reserving a “right” to respond to you later.
You are too willing to settle for less. America needs fighters for the Constitution NOW. EVERY Republican will win during this economic catastrophe, except maybe Oz. Reject Mitch!
Tuber guy in Alabama football coach. Cotton nothing. Josh hawley nothing. Many senators don’t have squat before running.
“Her background and prior experience are so limited that they are almost embarrassing for someone who is running for a U.S. Senate seat without ever having won an election before in her life.”
If this is some sort of hard and fast rule that must be obeyed in order to run for U.S. Senate — I couldn’t find it in the Constitution but maybe I missed it — then nearly 20% of the current Senators would be ineligible including some of the better ones like Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson and Mike Lee.
Add in a few others who only held some minor office (Chris Coons comes to mind) and we’re probably over 25% of the current Senate.
Nice try though.