Nuremberg 2.0 for Fauci & Co.
Vaccines did not really become available until February 2021. So we had what 400,000 deaths already? So we have another 600,000 deaths. How many of them were over 80? How many of them had cancer? Then with the remaining population which is younger and healthier, yes, vaccines do provide some protection.
Fauci’s just sad he wasn’t able to torture more Beagle puppies.
Nuremberg Trials 2.0 when?
I’m sure Fauci can console himself by taking a treasure bath in the money he has got from the snake oil he pushed.
Yup. NOT getting uber vaxxed/boostered would have saved a lot of folks from dying early.
Fauxci just can’t stop lying.
oh bs!! Most likely he’s mourning the death of the COVID and all the power it gave him and $$ it made him.
He needs to go away, soon.
If vaccinated by immediate manufacturing of traditional method vaccines instead of using Americans as lab rats for the unproven Mrna vax. The man is a Mengele
If vaccinated by immediate manufacturing of traditional method vaccines instead of using Americans as lab rats for the unproven Mrna vax. The man is a Mengele
Hi.
“...before adding “many of those deaths were avoidable”
Question:. If you have the Rona and get hit by a bus, was that an avoidable death?
5.56mm
AIDS killed 700,000 in the US on Fauci's watch. Just like COVID, most of these deaths were avoidable.
I saw this prick surfing channels on PBS ( 9 ) last night.
I saw his face and paused to hear what crap was coming out his cow pie hole this time,,,
,., he was saying the world was in extreme danger if he wasn’t given boatloads mo money.
Spit.
Yeah, the Remdesivir/ventilator patients.
Over 95% (orsomething like that) of people 70 have taken the injections. The average age of death from covid is over 75 yrs old. What exactly do you mean mR Fauci that if more people took an experimental jab more people would be alive.
Comparing the first nine full months of the pandemic (i.e., April-December 2020), at which time, for all practical purposes, no one in the U.S. had been vaccinated, to the same nine months in 2021, during which time millions of Americans had been vaccinated, we see that, for those below the age of 65, COVID deaths increased by 50% in the April-December 2021 time period, compared to 2020.
Breaking this down by specific age cohort, we see this:
Age 0-17 - an increase of 156%
Age 18-29 - an increase of 124%
Age 30-39 - an increase of 133%
Age 40-49 - an increase of 90%
Age 50-64 - an increase of 33%
A reduction in COVID deaths in April-December 2021, compared to April-December 2020, was realized only in those age cohorts 65 and above. Specifically:
Age 65-74 - a decrease of 14%
Age 75-84 - a decrease of 42%
Age 85+ - a decrease of 62%
"All cause" mortality, comparing April-December 2020 to April-December 2021, reflects this same bifurcation between the younger and older age cohorts, with each cohort below the age of 75 showing an increase in 2021 compared to 2020:
Age 0-17 - an increase of 7%
Age 18-29 - an increase of 4%
Age 30-39 - an increase of 15%
Age 40-49 - an increase of 14%
Age 50-64 - an increase of 6%
Age 65-74 - an increase of 2%
Only in those cohorts age 75 and above was there a decrease in "all cause" mortality in April-December 2021 compared to April-December 2020:
Age 75-84 - a decrease of 5%
Age 85+ - a decrease of 13%
It seems to me that any assessment of the public health response to the pandemic must take into account, and take account of, the foregoing data. These are deaths we're talking about. Not infections. Not hospitalizations. Deaths.
Are we to conclude, based on these data, that the results of the public health response to the pandemic is what we were hoping to achieve?
Furthermore, if the CHi-coms had been honest about the human-to-human transmission, we could have prepared a month or two to prevent a pandemic.
Let us not forget that both the NIH and WHO continued the lie.
Without "gain of function" research funded by NIH, covid would have remain moot, and wouldn't have even occurred.