[Rummyfan]

Apparently?! No, definitely!

[Rummyfan]

The NYT' understanding of the world:

Boy, the New Yorker only cost 75c in 1976?!

[marktwain]

The left is getting very, very desperate. It makes them very, very dangerous.

[FirstFlaBn]

NYT: if states have different speed limits, women won’t be allowed to drive.

[rktman]

Did they have a ‘zoom’ telecon with chicongo ‘mare’ lightenloafers about this crisis? After all, “they” are doubly threatened being a ‘glbtprqxyz’ with a ‘partner’ that isn’t a bipoc. 😨😲

[fruser1]

They wouldn’t let states define marriage as between a man and a woman.

[skeeter]

Duh

[sphinx]

Sometimes, I wonder if the editors of the New York Times have actually been to the United States.

No. They were formed in the leftist seminaries of the Ivy League, live in leftist echo chambers, and have never really experienced life in the actual United States.

[jigsaw]

Because my wife is a liberal, she’s a racist.

Because I’m a conservative, I’m not.

Question: Do we have an inter-racial marriage?

[Tupelo]

No Mr. Cooke, they are not stupid. This “opinion piece” is designed rile the Low Information Voters, the very low information voters. And to also stir fear and anger. I guarantee, there are enough very low IQ BLM & Antifa members, some with degrees, that are seething over this and it will take no more that some speaker saying the right words and it will be back to Burn Baby Burn.

[seowulf]

Some states would permit such marriages; others probably wouldn’t.

Which states, NYT?

They say interracial marriages because because virtually nobody has a problem with that. What they worry about though is same sex 'marriages'.

[Tymesup]

Why is Black capitalized?

Why is white lower case?

[skr]

Is NYC still considered part of the US?

[philman_36]

On a much more political note, this reversion to Federalism
is one of the last things the Democrats want to
have happen as it breaks apart their "democracy" facade.
It's hard to play that off when a Constitutional Republic
is staring you in the face.

Go play your liberal game in your State, let us in our State alone.

Oh, wait! Liberals are fleeing liberal States. They're like locusts.
Never mind.

[monkeyshine]

Imagine that every state were free to choose whether to allow people the right to carry a weapon. It would be a mish mash. You’d be fine driving along the interstate highway but as soon as you crossed into another state you’d be a felon!

[stuck_in_new_orleans]

Why is only “black” capitalized?

[backwoods-engineer]

Imagine that every state were free to choose whether to allow Black people and white people to marry. Some states would permit such marriages; others probably wouldn’t. The laws would be a mishmash, and interracial couples would suffer, legally consigned to second-class status depending on where they lived.

Sounds like what was done to gun owners before shall-issue and Constitutional carry laws were passed across the country.

[sunny bonobo]

Doesn’t the EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE of the Constitution throw their what ifs right out the window?

[Old Coach1]

Always trying to stir people up on racial lines. Thankfully I think most people are too smart for this. The Democrats think so little of black people. I don’t know anybody who is for banning interracial marriage.

[MV=PY]

It seems that the NYT hasn’t heard of state’s rights.

[gitmo]

The NYT is a pro-Nazi & pro-Soviet publication.