Ali and the AP Fart Checkers? ROTFL! Funny stuff.
The AP is tainted and wrong.
https://ugetube.com/watch/2000-mules-by-dinesh-d-souza-documentary_ElnLVOFcSCUaC4J.html
2000 Mules and Refutations of The Left (VANITY)
We discuss how the Left is singing in unison on refuting this with the same weak "fact checks".
What you saw is not true. The facts are not facts. That video of people stuffing multiple ballots in boxes is not what it looks like. That person had 284 relatives who were nursing confined, all registered to vote at 25 different locations throughout the city.
That geo-tracking is not accurate. It is only good to about 50 feet. That person had legitimate business at 25 locations all over the city. It was just a coincidence that each and every bit of personal business was withing 50 feet of a drop box. They were taking selfies when they voted.
It is just all made up. None of it is true. They are lying. Nothing wrong was done.
This opinion piece is listed under “news.”
The fox is guarding the henhouse.
“Fact checking” my foot.
Ass Press is incapable of fact checking anything, least of all a conservative movie proving massive ballot fraud in 2020.
It’s taken a while for them to figure out how to circle their wagons.
This is regurgitating the initial Mercury News hit from a few days ago.
I’m sure AP’s “fact-checkers” would be happy to sit down with Catherine Engelbrecht on some nationally-televised show and present their supposed case in a setting in which it could be challenged.
For example, even if the geotracking of the cell phone data can’t place an individual within a foot of a drop box, why are the individuals in question visiting a half-dozen different locations where drop boxes are located in a given loop on a given day?
And if the mules are wearing gloves because it’s cold outside and they’re scared of COVID, why did they only start wearing them after an Arizona mule got busted because of fingerprints on a ballot, how come they were wearing surgical gloves instead of mittens, and why did they throw them away once they posted the ballots they were toting?
What’s the theory on why the mules used the drop boxes in the first place? Couldn’t they have just mailed the ballots in?
Did they fact check catching the shooters of the girl who was shot in Atlanta using the phone ping location?
2000 Mules bump for later.....
4 million minutes of security video backing up the geotagged cell phone data is called evidence in any normal court.
if geotagged information isn’t enough to accurately track cellphones, someone better tell the Dept of Defense... seems we may have been killing all the wrong people with our drones
AssPress is desperate.
Everyone knew this response was coming- The technical dismissal defense. What isn’t admitted here is that the pings are not at a single drop box, but multiple boxes in the same night. In many cases, if not the majority, it’s accompanied by video surveillance.
Who drops off ballots (for their “family”) at multiple drop boxes in a single evening? Who then, does it all again the next evening?
who wouldn’t trust the AP?
Here’s how they whitewashed Hunter Bidens laptop story.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-questions-joe-biden-hunter-biden-88e27ca2b5e6d7c821d9a6a0ba0e04f8
“improper analysis of cellphone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box, according to experts. “
Yet it has been used to make sure people are standing 6 feet apart. How do you explain that AP?
Ali and the experts didn't watch the movie.
So the associated press believes cell phone tracking data was a great tool for the election protesters but a flawed tool for democrat ballot stuffers. Nope, no bias at all..