Posted on 03/26/2022 7:24:25 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
On Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time,” host Bill Maher said that many Republicans “would be thrilled to have no black seats” on the Supreme Court and also criticized then-President George H.W. Bush for nominating Justice Clarence Thomas to “the black seat” on the Supreme Court to replace Justice Thurgood Marshall even though Thomas doesn’t “represent the majority of black thinking in America.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Supreme Court is not about Race it’s about LAW you fool
I don’t care about a justice’s race. I care about what they THINK...how they act.
MLK Jr., a flawed man, got it 100% right when he said we should consider one’s character, not the color of their skin.
Can he name names then? C’mon, Bill. What are you afraid of? 🤣
Once a stupid...always a stupid.
How does white Maher begin to tell blacks what they think?
Isn’t that a form of condescension along with cultural appropriation?
“There Was Blood, There Were Bruises” – Flint School Board President Fired After Choking, Punching Treasurer Over Who Gets to Control $150 Million COVID Aid
Maher should do a poll of Democrats who want Jewish Justices. He is being disingenuous here; does he remember Janice Rogers Brown? Her nomination to the DC Circuit, by Bush, was help up by Rats. I imagine he would have nominated her to replace the idiot Sandy O’Connor, but he knew she would tough if not impossible to get through to SCOTUS seat.
Maher dated a black woman so that makes him an expert in black thought.
Thomas doesn’t represent the majority of black thinking.
Right, Justice Thomas knows what a woman is.
Notice how another limousine liberal presumes to speak for all black people. Um, isn’t that racist?
Black thinking= free stuff, no work, bloated govt?
He is not your friend.
Janice Rogers Brown says, “Hello”
WHICH blacks are actually “THINKING”????
Why fight over it? You are going to get an illegit justice from an illegit _resident.
Maher is trying to redeem himself over earlier comments he made that weren’t okay with the Twatterazzi.
They want Clarence gone so he needs good protection.
Thomas ‘Didn’t Represent the Majority of Black Thinking
There it is right there. I don’t want “black thinking” justices. I want colorblind justices that care about equal protection under U.S. law.
Wait a minute! This is a liberal saying that a political philosophy is more important than pigmentation? But when Republicans criticize black people for their politics, it’s all about their pigmentation? This is so confusing!
“...Thomas doesn’t ‘represent the majority of black thinking in America.’....”
Does Jackson ‘represent the majority of black thinking in America?’
The USSC isn't supposed to have much of a philosophy at all. It's supposed to rule that something before it is, or is not constitutional.
I propose we convert the constitution as written and amended into a binary database. Any argument before it could be presented as an algorithm to the database and the resulting zero or one would be the ruling. It is or is not. That's it. No dissenting opinions to politicize the audience.
I really WOULD be thrilled if there were no “black” seats. Or “white” seats,” or “wise latinx” seats.
How about HUMAN seats?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.