Finally: A Transparent Voting Process That Can't Be Corrupted, Hacked, or Cheated — Democrats Will Hate It

PJ Media ^ | 03/22/2022 | Kevin Downey Jr.

[SeekAndFind]

The left loves absentee voting, so I say let’s give it to them. And let’s make it as easy as picking up a scratch-off lottery ticket from the local store. Hell, let them vote on their phones. What could go wrong?

Nothing. Welcome to Redo Voting, the world’s first and only transparent, unhackable, incorruptible, paper-based voting system. No wiggle room on chain of custody, no Zuckerbucks to buy influence, and no reason to stop counting votes at 10:30 p.m. when the Republican presidential candidate is pummelling whatshisface, you know, the thing.

From the Redo Voting website:

Redo Voting is a hybrid of existing secure document technology used by state lotteries, combined with government-level encryption. The result is a voting system that is paper-based, but uses a web browser for data entry. A great example of this is your state’s lottery program. 45 states currently have a state-wide lottery, and because of the massive amounts of money that pass through that system the security is the best available this side of military encryption. If that were “hackable,” billions would be stolen on a regular basis; but it does not happen. We use the same technology and processes.

You may not yet have heard about the brilliance of Redo Voting, but it’s the latest rage in Washington, D.C. Everyone is talking about it.

You’ve heard a lot about “chain of custody” problems in the 2020 election. With Redo Voting, chain of custody is no longer an issue. It is 100% guaranteed from the printer right through exhaustion of post-election excuses. You cast your vote on a secure .gov domain website, and no one but you touches your ballot.

It can be used to vote in person or from anywhere on the planet.

[SeekAndFind]

Here is how that aspect works:

You get a scratch-off “ballot” (again, based on the same technology as a lottery scratch-off ticket) from any retail store, scratch it, and scan the QR code underneath with your phone (you can also enter the info into your home computer browser).

• Your browser is then directed to a state.gov website.
• Eligible registered voters cast their votes.
• The vote is private, secure, and sent directly to a secure database. It cannot be altered or deleted.

When voting is closed, the secretary of State applies a decryption key to the repository and tallies the votes in seconds. She/he can give the key to anyone who wants to see the results (including voters). The tallies can’t be altered.

The public instantly knows how many votes each candidate received.

Redo Voting co-founder and president John Rogers was asked about security. Isn’t everything hackable, including the Redo Voting system?

“Technically, yes,” Rogers told me, “but it would take all the computing power of a modern nation-state and roughly five billion years to do it.”

[Repeal The 17th]

On line voting?
No thanks.

[CarmichaelPatriot]

Would take a Constitutional Amendment to centralize it at the federal level. The Constitution gives the state legislatures the power to set election methods.

[Farcesensitive]

It’s a con job.

[TigersEye]

The real proof of the validity of this methodology will be how low loudly and insanely Democrats oppose it.

[Dr. Sivana]

My 83 year old mother has no cell phone, no desktop, and no interest in either.

[AndyTheBear]

How do they make sure each eligable voter gets one and only one of the scratch off ticket things?

[Jonty30]

The Carter commission concluded that balloting could not be secured under any conditions if there was no in-person voting only.

I’m inclined to agree.
The Corruptocrats and globalists would game the system and drive the costs of challenging the system so it costs millions of dollars per vote to verify the vote.

[joshua c]

you can grab as many scratch offs as you want but you can only use one

but how does it prevent someone from voting in your name?

[Pajamajan]

Bookmark

[Valpal1]

Theoretically, they would only print one per registered voter. No extras for spoilage, which is what they do with paper ballots, for either mail in or in person. Extra ballots for spoilage or walk-in election day registration is one of the better known cheats. Because the left over extra ballots can be “found” at 2 a.m.

The scratch of QR code ballot would not be compatible with states that allow registration right up to election day, but it would be compatible with both in person voting and vote from home. Theoretically.

I’m a big fan of in person voting and dye their finger so they can’t travel from precinct to precinct registering and voting, but the majority of people no longer want to stand out in the weather waiting to vote.

I think we should move election day to the end of May or beginning of June. November is a relic from when everyone farmed and when harvest was over.

[thoughtomator]

not buying it for a second

and I’ve done more election integrity work than anyone else

unfortunately EI has become just another playground for profit-seeking

[MAGAthon]

23 March: FrankSpeech: Mike Lindell: Bombshell Proof Of Election Machine Manipulation
https://frankspeech.com/article/bombshell-proof-election-machine-manipulation

[MAGAthon]

23 March: FrankSpeech: Mike Lindell: Bombshell Proof Of Election Machine Manipulation
https://frankspeech.com/article/bombshell-proof-election-machine-manipulation

[MAGAthon]

apologies for double posting.

[kiryandil]

Going to be interesting.

[JustaTech]

..within completely secure technical state infrastructure.

What a weird statement that is on the Redo website. Seems a bit at odds with all that "transparency".

In any case most of us spend and sometimes receive significant amounts of money via the Internet, and we do so securely with rare exceptions these days. We trade stocks and do our banking online with passwords protected by encryption.

We can/will vote online just as securely, and with real-time transparency. The software itself will be completely open source and audited by every skeptic who cares to look.

The precinct database of encoded ballots and running tallies will be an online spreadsheet which anyone can download and analyze for themselves at any time during or after the election. Each electronic ballot will have a serial number and will be displayed in the spreadsheet by serial number, so each voter will be able to find his particular ballot row in the spreadsheet and verify the votes were recorded properly across the columns of individual races/questions. The confidential index file which connects each serialized ballot to a registered voter will be the only non-transparent aspect, but it will be queryable at the order of a court with jurisdiction.

This part is important: You will not be able to prove how you voted to any third party without that proof including information traceable back to you (via the confidential index file), and that is good because it discourages vote selling.

This part is really important and it’s only possible if the election database has granularity down to each ballot, like a spreadsheet would: If it’s determined later that some of the ballots were bogus for whatever reason, those ballots can be transparently removed from the precinct spreadsheet and whatever damage they inflicted on the election disappears with them.

Online voting should be an option ASAP. I suspect it will become very popular especially if it's implemented correctly so that shenanigans are virtually impossible.

[gnarledmaw]

How do you stop someone taking the disabled down to get their tickets and then that person voting for all of them?

There are a lot of intellectually challenged individuals and those with mental health problems in programs that retain the right to vote. Most of those Ive worked with in the past would have either not cared if I voted for them or asked me to do it for them. I could have been worth 50 votes per election. The problem is that those that work in those career fields tend to vote against us maybe as much as 98% of the time.

[noiseman]

I share the skepticism of some others here for a couple of reasons. One reason is that with a lottery, no one cares who plays, nor how many times they play, nor even how many people in total played. All of those, however, are very important to a fair election. Second, no matter how secure the process, the eventual reporting of results is completely within the power of human beings. Even if election results were voted and tabulated 100% correctly, there’s still nothing to stop a sufficiently corrupt group of officials from just fabricating the final numbers. Nothing is beyond imagination given the level of proven fraud in 2020 that was simply willfully ignored by corrupt officials (of both parties), the media, courts, etc. 2020 proved that when the establishment is out to get someone, as they were with Trump, they will simply lie about everything, deny and even destroy records that are clearly to the contrary, and use the media and corrupt courts to silence the truthsayers.

Even with a very compromised system, we have a ton of proof that the 2020 election results were at a minimum unreliable, yet the “powers that be” completely ignore it. Simply installing a more accurate system won’t do a thing to stop these people from just circling the wagons to lie about a result that they don’t like. They won’t even acknowledge that there’s anything wrong with precincts where the number of ballots voted FAR exceeded the number of registered voters. That’s a result that is impossible, period. Yet those in charge just shrug and move on…”nothing to see here.”