Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: where's_the_Outrage?; EEGator; central_va; G Larry; TangoLimaSierra; Aevery_Freeman; Jay W; ...
This is the one of the finest, most honest and comprehensive articles about the subject of women in combat I have seen out there, written in 2015 by a woman who served in the USMC and understands these things first hand, Jude Eden:


LINK: "A Question of Standards-Women in Combat" by Jude Eden

This chart below explains it.

Keep in mind how the military must operate-they cannot prioritize the capabilities of a single person (such as a single female who might be physically more capable than a number of randomly picked males) because in battle, people are lost and must be replaced on the fly. (and this goes for men, too)

The military therefore has to deal with large numbers, medians, and averages when dealing with everything from average boot size to average strength and capability.

And this does not even broach the subject of mixing young men and women together in a dangerous environment far from home, the effects on the morale of a unit, or the differences in supply chain.

71 posted on 03/12/2022 8:08:39 AM PST by rlmorel (The concept of a "cashless society" is simply a vector for the exercise of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Israel had data about the co-ed units in combat, and it didn’t support the concept; while women could fight (the Uzi and Ephod vest could accommodate smaller/weaker soldiers), the effect on the male soldiers when females would get shot up was extremely damaging psychologically.

She seems to have a very realistic approach; the differences can’t be ignored without putting troops and missions in jeopardy. A super-strong woman may do well, but only because she is able to do the same tasks as the men with whom she must be interchangeable; that doesn’t happen with lowered standards for all women.

The new type of warfare fought from behind computer screens and within vehicles may be more “female-friendly”, but it doesn’t win wars; boots on the ground with rifles do that (as the Taliban just showed us).


76 posted on 03/12/2022 8:20:16 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Mixing young men and women together in a dangerous environment.

Not to take away anything from the female but it can induce risks.
Female pilots don’t increase any risks like ground combat does.


81 posted on 03/12/2022 8:26:44 AM PST by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

It isn’t just strength but temperament. Look at the 1990’s and the first gulf war. Half the women decided to get pregnant or obtain other outs and did not deploy. Women also tended to do desk duties so men had no place to go when injured.

Bottom line: Women do not pull their weight in combat positions.


82 posted on 03/12/2022 8:27:26 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Thank you for the link.


84 posted on 03/12/2022 8:35:00 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Thanks for the info.


89 posted on 03/12/2022 8:40:34 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Thanks for the info.


90 posted on 03/12/2022 8:40:34 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Thanks for the link and the extracted chart. The chart really captures the central issue with an easily-understood graphical depiction of reality.


94 posted on 03/12/2022 8:59:17 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

No offense intended, but don’t waste my time. What’s your point?


113 posted on 03/12/2022 11:22:11 AM PST by Qui is (First, never apologize to the enemy, and second, never forget that Biden spews and Harris swallows. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Excellent....yet I didn’t see lung capacity addressed.


136 posted on 03/12/2022 2:45:45 PM PST by G Larry (Tolerance will rise until intelligent people are banned from thinking to avoid offending imbeciles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Excellent post.


142 posted on 03/13/2022 8:39:20 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson