Posted on 03/04/2022 7:54:18 AM PST by george76
Trump not only successfully deterred Russia from acting against Ukraine, he effectively deterred a lot of bad behavior across the planet.
A recent Harvard-Harris poll found that 62 percent of Americans believe that Russia would not have invaded Ukraine if Donald Trump were still in the Oval Office. As former senior intelligence officials under President Trump, we agree with that view.
Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 when George W. Bush was president. Russia took Crimea in 2014 when Barack Obama was president. Russia has now invaded Ukraine with Joe Biden as president. However, when Donald Trump was president, Russia did not seize territory from any of its neighbors.
During his four years in office, Trump not only successfully deterred Russia from acting against Ukraine, he effectively deterred a lot of bad behavior across the planet. He focused on ending America’s foreign wars rather than launching new ones. At the same time, he brokered the Abraham Accords to expand peace in the Middle East.
The exercise of American power to deter adversaries is a complicated business. It involves a mix of military, economic, political, and diplomatic strategies and actions that together communicate the costs of threatening U.S. national interests.
Ultimately, the art of statecraft boils down to whether a president projects American strength that deters adversaries, or projects American weakness that emboldens our adversaries.
So how did Trump succeed in containing Putin while the Russian autocrat has run wild with others in the White House? Why was he so successful at spreading peace elsewhere? We believe the long answer begins with these ten ways that Donald Trump projected American strength and kept the bad guys in check:
Rebuilt the American Military.
Crusaded for American Energy Dominance.
Set the Tone by Launching Surgical Missile Strikes in Syria in Early 2017.
Developed Strong Relationships with Middle Eastern Nations Based on Mutual Interests.
Was Ruthless with the Taliban While Winding Down the Afghanistan War.
Crushed the ISIS Caliphate.
Demonstrated a Consistent Willingness to Take out the Bad Guys .
Stood Up to China .
Strategically Used Unpredictability as an Asset in Foreign Affairs .
Advanced Tough Russia Policies and Provided Lethal Aid to Ukraine while Maintaining an Open Dialogue.
Each of these points are worthy of unpacking in-depth, but there are several that illustrate the dramatic difference in approach between Trump and Biden, starting with Afghanistan.
When President Trump initiated the process of ending America’s longest war, senior officials huddled in the Situation Room to discuss tactical challenges on the ground. The president reminded the group of America’s humiliating withdrawal from Saigon at the end of the Vietnam War, and said we must do whatever it takes to leave in a safe, orderly, and dignified way.
When military leaders bemoaned the costs and logistical challenges of bringing home our equipment, the president said that he did not care if it was a helicopter or a styrofoam cooler. If it had an American flag on it, it was either coming home or getting destroyed to keep it from falling into the hands of our enemies. He vowed that we would leave on our terms, or we would not leave at all.
Tragically, President Biden’s approach – which included the decision to abandon the strategically important Bagram Air Base prior to the evacuation – cost the lives of 13 American servicemembers and led to the Taliban parading victoriously through Kabul with billions of dollars of American combat equipment. The administration’s stunning incompetence – detailed in an official U.S. Army report – made the United States look weak and vulnerable on the world stage, and Putin was watching.
The world took notice when Trump ordered the killing of Iranian terrorist general Qassem Soleimani, who had operated with impunity throughout the Middle East until the U.S. military sent two Hellfire missiles through his vehicle. As a candidate for president, Biden released a statement condemning the righteous attack as a “hugely escalatory move” that brought us to “the brink of a major conflict across the Middle East.” This, of course, proved to not be the case, but it illustrated Biden’s unwillingness to do what it takes to establish credible deterrence.
This principle of deterrence applies across the globe, which explains why the Chinese military has sent a record number of airplanes into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone since Biden took office.
To the specific case at hand, Trump was much tougher on Russia than the media have led people to believe, while Biden has been far softer.
Trump deployed such aggressive sanctions against Russia that President Obama’s Secretary of Defense Robert Gates called them the toughest in history, and he withdrew from one-sided treaties that hamstrung the U.S. while Russia violated the terms.
Biden has taken the opposite approach, appeasing Putin by handing him his top two geopolitical priorities on a silver platter. He unconditionally extended the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, allowing Russia to continue building tactical nuclear weapons while constraining our ability to modernize. And while Trump imposed sanctions to stop Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline in its tracks, construction was allowed to resume when Biden took office.
President Trump understood the power of building American energy dominance. By slashing onerous regulations, Trump sparked an American energy boom that ensured we would never be reliant on any other nation to meet our energy needs. Geopolitically, America’s increased export capacity reduced Putin’s leverage over our European allies, who depend on Russia for 40 percent of their gas and more than a quarter of their oil.
Trump approved the Keystone XL oil pipeline at home and shut down Russia’s Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline in Eastern Europe. Biden reversed both decisions, meaning he has been harder on America’s energy producers than he has been on Russia’s. To add insult to injury, as the Russian army pushed into Ukraine, Biden’s climate envoy John Kerry hoped aloud that “President Putin will help us to stay on track with respect to what we need to do for the climate.”
Vladimir Putin’s appetite for expansion did not wane during the four years Trump was in office, and the world was not just miraculously a safer place. Bad actors like Putin simply knew that they had to restrain themselves or deal with the consequences. In nearly every way possible, President Biden has weakened the United States and our allies and empowered Putin. As a result, Russia is on the march, even as the Ukrainian people have inspired the world with their courage and resilience. And in the wings, America’s greatest threat – Xi Jinping’s China – waits, and watches.
Mine too. You are not alone in your thinking.
I wonder at times how much further ahead our country (and the world) would be if he had been allowed to take his rightful place as POTUS.
In the hostage situation, fear was a factor.
However, the key in negotiating with an adversary is to treat them with respect (no name calling, no finger pointing, no arrogant virtue signaling), then find out what they want, and see if you can give them some of it.
Reagan’s people cut a deal that was a win win.
Trump was also an expert at that type of negotiation.
It is the combination of real strength and willingness to pursue win win outcomes that makes a great negotiator.
We know!
But the “establishment” together with the Democrats and GOP, Inc. wanted him gone!
Now look what’s happened!
It’s almost funny if it weren’t such a danger.
John and Cliff,
Y’all forgot that President Trump told Russia if they moved on any of their neighbors, then they’d lose Moscow.
[A stupid article
All they can say about Trump is that he “out neoconed the neocons”
If so, why did they hate him so much and worked for 5 years to remove him?]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Tokyo_(10_March_1945)
Had LBJ done that to Hanoi, the North Vietnamese would have sued for peace. Post WWII Democrats have treated GI’s like factory widgets - putting them in impossible situations and using them like so much firewood to coddle the enemy.
Where do you get the figure of 10,000 US aircraft shit down over Vietnam?
United States Air Force
All told, the U.S. Air Force flew 5.25 million sorties over South Vietnam, North Vietnam, northern and southern Laos, and Cambodia, losing 2,251 aircraft: 1,737 to hostile action, and 514 in accidents. 110 of the losses were helicopters and the rest fixed-wing. A ratio of roughly 0.4 losses per 1,000 sorties compared favorably with a 2.0 rate in Korea and the 9.7 figure during World War II.
https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Aircraft_losses_of_the_Vietnam_War
[Where do you get the figure of 10,000 US aircraft shit down over Vietnam?]
Trump likely would have quelled NATO talk and looked for a deal on the Eastern provinces
That’s just a gues
I think he and Pootie understood one another ...
bump
Hmm ok
.
Putin -- who clearly is not the same Putin of 5 years ago -- understood that even though Trump was not a neo-con, there is nothing in Trump's make-up that would have prevented him from staging Kadyrov death in Chechnya -- meeting the same fate as dead old dad and make it look like Spetnaz did it. Right there Putin would have to commit forces to put down a Chechnyan uprising.
Or Trump could have quietly meddled in Kazakhstan, and funded an earlier Tokayev v Nazarbayev revolution. Again, another diversion that would have committed Putin to split forces once Kazakhstan melted down.
Putin knows there is zero chance the US alphabets would attempt either near-perfect subterfuge under Biden's White Hospice, a zombie who must choose the narrowest path of pre-determined caution abroad.
Mine too. Trump and Putin are both against the NWO,one world govt globalist. Rightfully so, I am too. Trump saw Putin as possible someone he could work with because he respected his position and Putin respected Trump’s. Jmo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.