These politicians really don’t care which side of an issue they support.
They are simply people with no moral compass for hire .
Bravo Sierra
Just a gasbag who is trying the gaslight Texas. Fool you twice, same on you for even listening to this power hungry stooge.
If anyone believes that, I have a real estate deal I want to make with them. What possess these guys to tell lies that absolutely no one is going to buy?
This guy’s hubris is amazing. He couldn’t beat anyone, not if you put light sabers in both hands.
So much pivoting by the Democrats on EVERYTHING in the last 24 hours that I’m surprised they’re even standing upright. Liars. All. Of. Them. Are. Liars.
O’Rourke told reporters in Tyler, Texas on Tuesday, according to KLTV. “What I want to make sure that we do is defend the Second Amendment.”
And not a single “reporter” asked questions to expose the gimmick Beato is using to say he’ll “defend the Second Amendment”. You can bet his facile “interpretation” twists gun ownership from an absolute Right of the People into a severely limited privilege controlled and licensed by government.
He wants to “defend” his version of the Second Amendment, which has about 10,000 loopholes in it that allow the government to deny you a firearm or take them away and put you on a “do not sell to” list that anyone can put you on where you cannot view and there is no process to get off it.
“Beto says he isn’t ‘interested’ in ‘taking’ guns ‘from anyone,’ wants to defend Second Amendment”
Oh, piss off.
Mexican Bob rides again.
I read an interesting argument that there is disagreement as to whether Beto O’Rourke is a “greasy weasel” or a “sleazy, greasy weasel”. (I tend to lean to the latter).
However, I wonder which you all would prefer?
The first description is succinct and has a more memorable sound to it, but the latter can be argued is more descriptive.