Ping for your interest
Trump’s touting Ivermectin has really labeled it the anti drug. Strange how people think.
This may be a start, but it misses the point that Ivermectin is best used at the START of the infection rather than when the patient is critically. It kills the virus before it can do the damage that makes the patient critical.
From what I’ve read, ivermectin wouldn’t be much use if you’re on a ventilator. Perhaps I’m wrong.
And what gives these control freaks the right to determine what one may or may not take to alleviate whatever may ail oneself?
People need this drug before the ventilator. Nobody should have to craft laws to take a medication that has been on the market for many years and is pretty safe.
We have to stop these work arounds. Time to stand up a make the people like Fauci keeping this drug from people to pay . It is all political.
Studies on whether ivermectin is beneficial in treating COVID-19 patients haven’t been conclusive, and health officials have warned people not to self-medicate. But multiple large trials are continuing to assess the antiparasitic drug. Click on the English version if it appears in Spanish:
It needs to be administered early, not when critical. They really don’t want that drug to succeed, do they?
Reality is: The newly diagnosed would benefit, as well. It could easily prevent cases from becoming more serious. One step at a time, tho
The primary benefit of ivermectin is preventing viral reproduction in cell that usually occurs in the first week of infection; except for some anti-inflamatory properties, critically sick COVID-19 patients get little benefit from ivermectin.
What is the logic of not administering the medicine upon onset of symptoms and/or positive test?
What is the logic of withholding medicine until it’s probably too late and then giving it?
Is that idea the product of studies? History of usage outcomes? Show your work, doctors.
Such a pile of poorly researched words.
“ivermectin for critically sick COVID-19 patients” — why would they delay it’s use until the point where it is almost too late? That is utterly ridiculous.
Here they go missing the Mark again. Ivermectin works best when tried early not late
The biggest problem with it is, it’s readily available. Very available. But the FDA isn’t letting the big pharmacies give it out since they deemed its use for covid as off-label. Even though, previously, doctors could use whatever they wanted for what never they wanted.
My mom went through the FLCCC, early, and go the whole protocol for $30. About a week later, the FDA dropped the hammer. Now you have to find an apothecary, where you’ll pay over $100 for it.
Here in Georgia, there are many doctors that’ll help you with it and help you find it, but you have to test positive. I guess making sure there’s enough to go around for those that are sick as opposed to everyone trying to get it as a prophylactic.
Interestingly, there are still so many that don’t know much about it or they’re the liberal/Fauci Cultists that still think it’s horse paste.
“... for critically sick COVID-19 patients ...”
That’s really too late. Ideally, Ivermectin (and zinc, D, etc.) should be taken at first symptoms.
So the patients have to be on life support and they have to request the IVM.
This is moronic.
If it is an effective drug, why wait until people are on death’s door?
Everything I have heard or read about Ivm is that its efficacy diminishes in time. The first 48hours of a congested cough with fever is the best time for IVM or HCQ to be most effective.