Posted on 01/13/2022 9:53:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Scientific “anger” doesn’t sound very “scientific.”
Professional affirmative-action government bureaucrats are not scientists.
They flatter themselves.
only 270 scientists pushing the lies ?
“And of course, just three of the signatories are immunologists, roughly 10% are nurses or nurse practitioners, and 33 are some type of ‘assistant’ (professor, nurse, lab, etc.). In short - hardly any of these people are qualified to refute Malone, which is probably why they link to ‘fact checks’ instead of compiling their own response on the merits of what Malone said.”
Perhaps but I’m sure they would be considered credible sources in this forum if they supported Malone.
If you can’t question it, it’s not science, it’s propaganda.
What a tremendous list of recognized experts in the field! /SARCASM
A random sampling half way down the list...
aura Hlohinec, RN: Registered Nurse
Lauren Bello-Matricaria, MPH: Clinical Research Monitor
Laren Seserko, OTR/L
Leah Steinberg: Medical Student
Lexi Goldstein, MD: Medical Resident
Lia Griffiths, PsyD: Psychologist
Lindsey Shultz, MD: Public Health Advisor
Lisa Boone, PA-C: Physician Assistant
Lisle Winston, MD: Medical Resident
Loralee Richter, PA-C, MS: Physician Assistant
Lorna Tychostup, MS: Senior Communications Consultant, NYU
I read elsewhere that only three of those who signed this are immunologists and the vast majority of others are nursing assistants and nurse practitioners. None of these are qualified to dispute what Malone says. Malone’s qualifications and experience is vastly greater than any of these people.
More like 270 state-sponsored drones who receive “checks” to do the deep state’s bidding.
270 very angry Marxists demand that Joe rogan not be allowed the right to free speech!
Sadly there likely won’t be an army of scientists who have Joe’s back, which is a testament to the fact that most scientists are either a part of the problem, or too cowardly to defend the truth and defend malone
” ... demand they censor Rogan and implement a Covid-19 “misinformation policy,” so that people, even highly trained virologist-immunologists such as Malone, can’t contradict ‘the science.’”
If you censor to avoid contradiction, it’s not science.
270 bought and paid for lackies of big pharma. The medical community has just about destroyed any credibility they may have had during this hoax.
Not supportive of free speech, are they?
270 Political hacks....................
“Scientific “anger” doesn’t sound very ‘scientific.’”
Proof with MSM “fact checks” doesn’t sound very scientific either. GIGO.
‘Scientists?’ I remember back in 98 when 400 Constitutional Scholars, Doris Kearns Goodwin among them, took out a full page ad in the NYT saying that a BJ was not sex.
Oh, and for the record, a poly sci degree is not science
Settles science brooks no dissent, Mr. Galileo. Now get on the rack, please.
That list is a “Who’s Who” of our finest Medical Government Bureaucrats!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.