Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

270 Angry Scientists Cite MSM ‘Fact Checks’ In Open Letter Urging Spotify To Censor Joe Rogan For Giving Airtime to Dr. Robert Malone
Nation and State ^ | 01/13/2022 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 01/13/2022 9:53:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2022 9:53:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Joe Rogan has completely disrupted the legacy media.


2 posted on 01/13/2022 9:54:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Scientific “anger” doesn’t sound very “scientific.”


3 posted on 01/13/2022 9:54:53 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

4 posted on 01/13/2022 9:54:57 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Professional affirmative-action government bureaucrats are not scientists.

They flatter themselves.


5 posted on 01/13/2022 9:55:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

only 270 scientists pushing the lies ?


6 posted on 01/13/2022 9:56:46 AM PST by no-to-illegals (The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“And of course, just three of the signatories are immunologists, roughly 10% are nurses or nurse practitioners, and 33 are some type of ‘assistant’ (professor, nurse, lab, etc.). In short - hardly any of these people are qualified to refute Malone, which is probably why they link to ‘fact checks’ instead of compiling their own response on the merits of what Malone said.”

Perhaps but I’m sure they would be considered credible sources in this forum if they supported Malone.


7 posted on 01/13/2022 9:57:36 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you can’t question it, it’s not science, it’s propaganda.


8 posted on 01/13/2022 9:57:40 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a tremendous list of recognized experts in the field! /SARCASM

A random sampling half way down the list...

aura Hlohinec, RN: Registered Nurse

Lauren Bello-Matricaria, MPH: Clinical Research Monitor

Laren Seserko, OTR/L

Leah Steinberg: Medical Student

Lexi Goldstein, MD: Medical Resident

Lia Griffiths, PsyD: Psychologist

Lindsey Shultz, MD: Public Health Advisor

Lisa Boone, PA-C: Physician Assistant

Lisle Winston, MD: Medical Resident

Loralee Richter, PA-C, MS: Physician Assistant

Lorna Tychostup, MS: Senior Communications Consultant, NYU


9 posted on 01/13/2022 9:57:59 AM PST by Golden Eagle (What's in YOUR injection?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I read elsewhere that only three of those who signed this are immunologists and the vast majority of others are nursing assistants and nurse practitioners. None of these are qualified to dispute what Malone says. Malone’s qualifications and experience is vastly greater than any of these people.


10 posted on 01/13/2022 9:58:14 AM PST by NicoDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

More like 270 state-sponsored drones who receive “checks” to do the deep state’s bidding.


11 posted on 01/13/2022 9:58:18 AM PST by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

270 very angry Marxists demand that Joe rogan not be allowed the right to free speech!

Sadly there likely won’t be an army of scientists who have Joe’s back, which is a testament to the fact that most scientists are either a part of the problem, or too cowardly to defend the truth and defend malone


12 posted on 01/13/2022 9:59:33 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

” ... demand they censor Rogan and implement a Covid-19 “misinformation policy,” so that people, even highly trained virologist-immunologists such as Malone, can’t contradict ‘the science.’”

If you censor to avoid contradiction, it’s not science.


13 posted on 01/13/2022 9:59:35 AM PST by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

270 bought and paid for lackies of big pharma. The medical community has just about destroyed any credibility they may have had during this hoax.


14 posted on 01/13/2022 9:59:51 AM PST by JayAr36 (Just watching the demise of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not supportive of free speech, are they?


15 posted on 01/13/2022 10:00:14 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

270 Political hacks....................


16 posted on 01/13/2022 10:00:17 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Scientific “anger” doesn’t sound very ‘scientific.’”

Proof with MSM “fact checks” doesn’t sound very scientific either. GIGO.


17 posted on 01/13/2022 10:00:26 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

‘Scientists?’ I remember back in 98 when 400 Constitutional Scholars, Doris Kearns Goodwin among them, took out a full page ad in the NYT saying that a BJ was not sex.

Oh, and for the record, a poly sci degree is not science


18 posted on 01/13/2022 10:01:11 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Not supportive of free speech, are they?

Settles science brooks no dissent, Mr. Galileo. Now get on the rack, please.

19 posted on 01/13/2022 10:01:28 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

That list is a “Who’s Who” of our finest Medical Government Bureaucrats!


20 posted on 01/13/2022 10:02:02 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson