Posted on 01/07/2022 2:54:28 PM PST by Hostage
I pray you are right.
Yes, Roberts is traitorous.
But Barrett is as big a concern.
What is their connection?
Federalist Society brought both Roberts and Barrett.
Lost in the noise was $17+ million to the grifter class (DC lawyer racket) paid to “shepherd” Barrett to Trump for the nomination/appointment.
Barbara Lagoa, Cuban-American Judge from Florida was also a nominee. She’s a solid conservative constitutionalist anti-communist. Had she been selected, none of this would be in front of us.
Then there’s this:
And this:
https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html
Both should be before SCOTUS now on the Biden Tyranny case. Both relate to EFFING Pfizer whose executive suite should be summarily shot by firing squad or drop shipped over Tehran. Crimes against humanity.
On the second link, ask me if you have any questions or difficulty following. It’s my wheelhouse and I’m maximally passed off which should make for good melodramatic entertainment.
They are not mistakes, they are deliberate lies.
i have to think this would be the way as well. It has a way to far-reaching effect. Allow states to make mandates, that’s one thing. and there is a case from 1905 that supports that. So I think it’s going down. But we’ll see Roberts si way too much of a wild card for me.
Our side for the most part, doesn’t believe in marxists evil.
Hope your Zen Master is correct.
I thought the Supremes were supposed to rule on Constitutionality of laws—not the efficacy of vaccines or severity of the pandemic.
Robert Barnes of Barnes Law, who streamed the whole thing, agreed 6-3 or 5-4 against vaxxes.
Since when does having a law degree equate to having a medical degree?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.