To: Jim Robinson
A lot of folks may not understand the legal nuance here. This isn't about "individual liberty" at all. OSHA regulations and the burden of enforcement apply to employers, not the employees.
A lot of "individual liberty" goes out the window once you work for someone else. You've already surrendered much of your freedom to the employer, and now we're learning how much autonomy and power the employer has surrendered to OSHA.
111 posted on
01/07/2022 7:53:52 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
To: Alberta's Child
It most certainly is about individual liberty. Doing it in a twisted way, making someone else mandate it, still effects your individual liberty.
All the ‘young’ folks have been conditioned by ‘government’ education to believe the government can do anything to you it wants to, and the non-elected governmental bodies too.
This is fundamental individual liberty. Your body and right to work and move freely.
126 posted on
01/07/2022 7:58:52 AM PST by
TianaHighrider
(God moved David to STAND UP to Goliath ❣)
To: Alberta's Child
That was the reasoning behind mandatory drug tests as a condition of employment.
Soon it will be mandatory birth control as a condition of employment
129 posted on
01/07/2022 8:00:33 AM PST by
redgolum
(If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
To: Alberta's Child
You've already surrendered much of your freedom to the employer, and now we're learning how much autonomy and power the employer has surrendered to OSHA. That's the beauty of fascism. Hitler: "Hey, I didn't throw you into an oven, the I.G. Farben company did."
263 posted on
01/07/2022 9:03:57 AM PST by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson