My point in providing the link was not to argue Wood’s case, or on what basis the case was successfully set or not, but that the Consent Agreement existed at all (which has not been refuted to my knowledge).
Had the public been aware of the possibility of such an agreement being reviewed and agreed upon the outpouring of backlash from the voters in this states would have swamped The SoS office and the Governor’s office.
Also, I don’t know what you think is cute about your particular example regarding perjury means, but it must be an inside joke only to you. You sound like and out-of-state DNC lawyer, frankly.
> Also, I don’t know what you think is cute about your particular example regarding perjury means...
Plenty of perjury... I thought that was a pretty funny typo... Ok, whatever.