Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pearl Harbor: What If Japan Never Attacked?
1945 ^ | 12/7/21 | Robert Farley

Posted on 12/07/2021 9:26:40 AM PST by MAGA2017

What if Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbor eighty years ago today?

The attack is today regarded as an enormous tactical success, but a strategic failure. Several older battleships were damaged or destroyed, but the treachery of the attack spurred the United States to fully mobilize for war and to pursue that war with a vengeful fury. The attack also pushed the United States to adopt innovative tactics that would quickly overturn Japanese advantages in air and naval technology. What other military options did Japan have besides an attack on Pearl Harbor?

It would have been extremely difficult for Japan to avoid attacking the United States in the context of a general offensive into Southeast Asia. While Washington had stopped short of making an ironclad security guarantee to British and Dutch possessions in Asia, it had made clear to Tokyo that it did not welcome further aggression. The US had cut Japan off from steel and oil, putting tremendous economic pressure on the Japanese war machine.

(Excerpt) Read more at 19fortyfive.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 1941; hawaii; japan; pearlharbor; worldwareleven
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last
To: MAGA2017
What if Hitler had the sweet dispostion of Lassie?

Some alternate histories aren't worth any attention. Japan's WW2 was so nutso that parsing out elements of it are silly.

121 posted on 12/07/2021 11:13:55 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

FDR really had put the Japanese in a hard bind. I am sure much of US policy was in Asia was pressure from the UK that feared for its own possessions on Asia.


122 posted on 12/07/2021 11:15:31 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Several different sources agree with you. They thought that this could give them some time. Others thought a hard enough blow would cause us to sue for peace.

However, Yamamoto had been to the United States, knew the size and the power, and did not want to do this. That was why he made the point about having to march to DC. The only way to get America to sue for peace would have been to force us.

Now I am even angrier at Biden and the debacle in AFG.


123 posted on 12/07/2021 11:20:12 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Yes, you are correct. I was not trying to correct your statement but merely pointing out the obvious as to the media’s culpability in trying to ‘pull the wool over the people’s eyes.’

My point was that the media had to ‘protect’ Truman’s back side by saying that the surrender was ‘unconditional,’ when it clearly was not ‘unconditional.’ Truman’s lie seems to have withstood the truth.


124 posted on 12/07/2021 11:23:38 AM PST by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Land is simply a place I visit until I can return to the sea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Because American cryptographers had also broken the Japanese naval code, the leaders in Washington knew as well that Japan’s “measures” would include an attack on Pearl Harbor.


The official history is that the Japanese naval codes were not ‘broken’ until just prior to the Midway operation — not prior to Pearl Harbor.


125 posted on 12/07/2021 11:24:04 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

>> “What If?” is for children and Old People <<<

‘What if’ is for people who do threat analysis and disaster preparedness.

Upside for you is you can go ahead and get rid of your guns, first aid kit, and fire extinguishers. Oh, and cancel all your insurance policies, too.


126 posted on 12/07/2021 11:24:14 AM PST by MercyFlush (DANGER: You are being conditioned to view your freedom as selfish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Something I read a while ago was that the initial Japanese plan was to bypass the Philippines, as it did not offer enough economic spoils to warrant the effort. However, the decision was made that, since it lay astride the shipping routes between the primary prizes of Malaya and the Indies, and the home islands, the Philippines had to be taken as well.

The Japanese really stretched themselves thin during the Hundred Days of conquest...they had tight allocations of forces and time allotted to conquer their targets. Some campaigns (such as Malaya and Singapore) were great successes...others (notably the Philippines) became debacles.


127 posted on 12/07/2021 11:26:49 AM PST by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy...and call it progress" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Yep.

People do not learn history and so are inclined to argue with me but Japan really did want to take over a large chunk of the world. And they had been working on it for sixty years at that point. Imperial Japan was far more dangerous and monstrous then people want to believe.

And if you talk with the older Japanese they will tell you about what was planned and what they did. Well, probably most of them have passed on now but back almost 40 years ago they would tell you.

Had someone try to tell me that Japan was just trying to liberate occupied Asia counties from the grip of western imperialism. Which, when you consider that Japan treated non-Japanese Asians far worse then the western imperialist did, is kind of humorous. In a very grim sort of way.

128 posted on 12/07/2021 11:30:31 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (add a dab of lavender in milk, leave town with an orange and pretend you're laughing with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MercyFlush

Different ‘What if’, future tense, not past.................


129 posted on 12/07/2021 11:30:43 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: al baby

I just watched it again a few weeks ago.


130 posted on 12/07/2021 11:31:23 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

Sooner or later the US would have been drawn into the war even if Pearl Harbor had not happened. What Pearl Harbor accomplished was galvanizing the American people into supporting the war and almost immediately killing the large isolationist movement.


131 posted on 12/07/2021 11:33:47 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Hi Michael,

Aside from being on day 5 of the end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it gastro version of the dreaded, “Let’s destroy the economy” virus things are going great. The kids have reached orbit with their biz and the dog is healthy.

Hope you and yours are doing well.

Cannot believe it’s been 20 years since the Dem Talk Radio days.


132 posted on 12/07/2021 11:34:03 AM PST by Rebelbase ( State Dept. Havana Syndrome victims: Guinea pigs of 5G/graphene oxide vax experiments?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

The fuel tanks around Pearl Harbor were above ground. They were buried during the war, but after the attack on Pearl Harbor.


133 posted on 12/07/2021 11:36:37 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: M1903A1

The Japanese really stretched themselves thin during the Hundred Days of conquest...they had tight allocations of forces and time allotted to conquer their targets. Some campaigns (such as Malaya and Singapore) were great successes...others (notably the Philippines) became debacles.


The initial Japanese landings on US-held Wake Island were actually defeated by the US Marines. This upset the Japanese timetable, but the US air & naval forces were so disorganized after the Pearl Harbor attack that the Japanese returned and succeeded in taking the cut-off troops.


134 posted on 12/07/2021 11:41:28 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

he was on a roll...


135 posted on 12/07/2021 11:50:48 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

Good for him. He saw quite a lot of major fighting, bless his heart.

We were all patriotic then. My dad went down to enlist, they found he had a heart murmur, so he became a “dollar a year man.” A volunteer with special skills that might be needed. He had several restaurants and knew how to provide meals for hundreds of people at a time.


136 posted on 12/07/2021 11:53:18 AM PST by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
My Grandfather thought the Kingfish was the greatest governor LA ever had for providing school books to the kids and building roads and bridges all over the place.

Mussolini and Hitler did the same thing.

137 posted on 12/07/2021 11:55:37 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal
His whole strategy for 3-years had been to maneuver the U.S. into the war in support of England

And rightly so. The problem wasn't just Germany, it was Germany with Japan and Italy. I thought FDR's "Arsenal of Democracy" speech pretty much made the case for war.

138 posted on 12/07/2021 11:57:09 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

A day that will live in infamy indeed. As for Japan vs Islam? Different. Islam is sneaky, Japan right up front. Plus, I have Japanese friends now. As a woman, I doubt I’ll ever have a muslim friend.


139 posted on 12/07/2021 11:58:33 AM PST by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

I’ll just state the obvious, if things were different, they wouldn’t be the same.


140 posted on 12/07/2021 12:04:31 PM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson