Posted on 11/24/2021 6:00:28 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
When is this skank going to take her dirt nap?
Can anyone name one civil libertarian on the Left?
Didn’t think so.
The Left and their Gramsci Cultural Marxism language has changed the meaning of Civil Rights and Human Rights beyond recognition.
Hillary and Putin still at it.lol
Projection!
Good to see that our President is still living rent free in the beasts’ head. Makes me smile.
We know, we know. You'll be plotting and scheming until your first breath of brimstone.
She’s still campaigning against Trump. Does she think it’s 2016?
How’d that work out for you, Shrill Hill?
Meanwhile Democrats are pushing Apple to ban Trump’s social media app and presence on any media. The days when Liberals cared about civil liberties like free speech are long over.
Vince Foster rapping on box.
Mrs. Bill Clinton is the bottomless well of poison.
The Master of Lies has once again stood the truth on its head.
The correct quote ought to have been: “President Donald Trump supporters love and support “civil rights and human rights, the cultural changes.”
Human rights are properly inalienable rights, as outlined in our Constitution. These are the rights inherited by birth from God, the God Given Rights.
I know I did not see any of them around.
“...conservatives believe strongly in human rights, including those listed in the bill of rights, and other places in the constitution and declaration of independence...”
You can hate the UN Commission on Human Rights as a left wing organization, but no conservative should have any issue with most of what is in the declaration of human rights [excepting the articles that suggest a right to open borders].
“... former President Donald Trump supporters feared “civil rights and human rights, the cultural changes.”
Yes they do. They fear that the civil and human rights do qualify to be the improvement of problems of equality as all the laws on the books are being ignored now. And by both sides of the issue. You don’t need to create new laws to fix a problem with an old one. Just use the old one to work.
And at the same time allow the states to vote in and utilize their laws as they see fit. One central government cannot design a law that is going to apply properly to the whole country. This is one of the reasons the founders created states’ rights. That and they didn’t trust the federal government not to overstep their authority. Hmmm...they were pretty smart.
wy69
Says the one most intensely involved with the removal of such rights from people she doesn’t like - the rights of self defense, of free speech, free thought, and freedom of assembly, the right to keep what one earns and to be safe from unreasonable search and seizure, need I go on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.