One of the five victims killed in Sunday’s Christmas parade tragedy has been pictured.
Virginia “Ginny” Sorenson, 79, was described by loved ones as the “beating heart” of the Milwaukee Dancing Grannies.
Posted on 11/21/2021 8:45:44 PM PST by Its All Over Except ...
BREAKING: Suspect in Waukesha ‘mass casualty incident’ identified as career criminal Darrell E. Brooks
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...
A convicted violent felon with a long history of bail jumping, including a current felony bail jumping charge, yet the judge lets him out on $500 bond.
This is due to the nationwide push by Soros DA's, BLM, AOC and the "Squad" pushing for no bail for these criminals. And this is far from the first time these violent felons have committed murder, rape and other violent crimes after being released on little to no bail.
Apparently Brooks was released on bail this month for running over a woman. Surely there were some conditions on that release that he violated by plowing his car into a parade and thereby murdering innocent people? I guess there is also the insanity defense.
In the most recent case, a woman told police Brooks purposefully ran her “over with his vehicle” while she was walking through a gas station parking lot after he had followed her there after a fight, according to the criminal complaint. The woman was hospitalized for her injuries, court records show.
Wow. Even if Brooks had just stabbed someone, that does NOT mean he didn't intentionally drive into the parade to kill people. It seems clear it was intentional, and Brooks' documented black supremacist history cannot be discounted.
Math Boi Fly was out Joy (Reid) riding.
That article didn't mention Rittenhouse, but just wait.
yup, runnin from white cops in fear for his life
I have not seen any NEWS of such prosecution of an ANTIFA or
BLM criminal. The news is nlikely to report it.
They are not being prosecuted IMHO.
This is bad news, because eventually these BLM and ANTIFA looters will simply be shot by property owners and vigilantes. This will trrigger wide spread fighting and p[ossibly CW II. That could be THE PLAN the lefty feds have.
States could simply pass a law saying its OK to use deadly force to defend property, and OK to use deadly force in apprehension of a fleeing felon.
All this crap would be over in pretty short order.
The sad part about this case is that Wisconsin has no death penalty. It is an act of terror, a politcal act of terror. Federal law should be used to try this idiot Brooks and award him the death penalty.*
*******************************************************
Definitions Domestic Terrorism for the FBI’s purposes is referenced in U.S. Code at 18 U.S.C. 2331(5), and is defined as activities:
• Involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
• Appearing to be intended to: o Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
o Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or o Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping; and • Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
This is a definitional statute, not a charging statute. We talk about the threat these actors pose as Domestic Terrorism threats, but each of the FBI’s threat categories, described in further detail below, uses the words “violent extremism” because the underlying ideology itself and the advocacy of such beliefs is not prohibited by US law.
In using the term Domestic Terrorism, DHS looks to the Homeland Security Act definition of terrorism, 6 U.S.C. 101(18), which is substantially similar but not identical to the title 18 definition. That provision defines terrorism as any activity that:
• Involves an act that: o Is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources; and o Is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State or other subdivision of the United States; and • Appears to be intended: o To intimidate or coerce a civilian population; o To influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or o To affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.
In this vein, the FBI and DHS use the term Domestic Violent Extremist (DVE) to describe an individual based and operating primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States who seeks to further their ideological goals wholly or in part through unlawful acts of force or violence.1 It is important to remember that the mere advocacy of ideological positions and/or the use of strong rhetoric does not constitute violent extremism, and in some cases direct or specific threats of violence must be present to constitute a violation of federal law.
Terminology The US Government, including the FBI and DHS, continually reviews and evaluates intelligence to ensure it is appropriately identifying and categorizing a variety of national security threats to the Homeland. As part of this continual internal review, the FBI and DHS reconfigure broad threat categories as the threats evolve. While categories help the FBI better understand the criminal actors we pursue, we recognize actors’ motivations vary, are nuanced, and sometimes are derived from a blend of ideologies. The categories also inform the intelligence and prevention efforts of DHS. Currently, the US Government broadly divides the DT threat among the following threat categories:
Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremism: This threat encompasses the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence in furtherance of ideological agendas derived from bias, often related to race or ethnicity, held by the actor against others or a given population group. Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists purport to use both political and religious justifications to support their racially-or ethnically-based ideological objectives and criminal activities. Anti-Government or Anti-Authority Violent Extremism: This threat encompasses the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence in furtherance of ideological agendas, derived from anti-government or anti-authority sentiment, including opposition to perceived economic, social, or racial hierarchies, or perceived government overreach, negligence, or illegitimacy. Animal Rights/Environmental Violent Extremism: This threat encompasses the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence in furtherance of ideological agendas by those seeking to end or mitigate perceived cruelty, harm, or exploitation of animals and/or the perceived exploitation or destruction of natural resources and the environment. Abortion-Related Violent Extremism: This threat encompasses the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence in furtherance of ideological agendas relating to abortion, including individuals who advocate for violence in support of either pro-life or pro-choice beliefs. All Other Domestic Terrorism Threats: This category encompasses threats involving the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence in furtherance of ideological agendas which are not otherwise defined under or primarily motivated by one of the other Domestic Terrorism threat categories. Such agendas could flow from, but are not limited to, a combination of personal grievances and beliefs, including those described in the other Domestic Terrorism threat categories. Some actors in this category may also carry bias related to religion, gender, or sexual orientation.
1 The DHS Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) does so in accordance with its Attorney General-approved Intelligence Oversight Guidelines (Policy No. IA-1000). I&A uses the term “domestic terrorist,” defined in those guidelines, interchangeably with “domestic violent extremist” to describe such an actor.
Methodology
The FBI recognizes a Domestic Terrorism Incident as an ideologically-driven criminal act, including threats or acts of violence made to specific victims, made in furtherance of a domestic ideological goal, that has occurred and can be confirmed. A single incident may be comprised of a scheme or a serial criminal or violent activity conducted by the same perpetrator(s) using the same tactic(s).
The FBI recognizes a Domestic Terrorism Plot as a combination of criminal activity and planning that collectively reflect steps toward criminal action in furtherance of a domestic ideological goal. Disrupted Domestic Terrorism Plots are plots which, in the FBI’s assessment, absent law enforcement intervention could have resulted in a Domestic Terrorism incident.
The FBI makes every effort to proactively document lethal and non-lethal Domestic Terrorism incidents, but it is important to note there is no mandatory incident reporting requirement that mandates state and local law enforcement agencies to report criminal activity that appears to be ideologically-motivated consistent with the DT threat categories previously defined. This makes it impossible for the FBI to ensure we have complete and comprehensive knowledge of any and all incidents of this nature that may take place across the United States. For example, if the FBI does not receive notification from state and local officials of an ideologically-motivated criminal act, especially one that did not result in injury or loss of life, the FBI may not know to include that incident in our records.
Probably so. I don’t know what I was thinking.
Only if All the Victim’s were Black.
Damned it, now I’m Racist because I used the B word.
That’s likely to be what the media claims, and it would be believable that is what he was thinking. . . But that in no way makes his case the same as Rittenhouse’s.
nor make it true...
“ FACEBOOK is lit up: some good stuff on there.”
********************************************
Whatever “good stuff” was there is now gone. Facebook has disappeared it.
That’s atrocious!! Clear indication that this guy will use a vehicle to attack people. Media is saying he was fleeing from a domestic disturbance. I say bullshit. Was he fleeing from a domestic disturbance when he ran over that woman in the gas station? Somebody needs to corner the Milwaukee D.A. (John Chisholm), and ask him specifically, what in this guy’s record led him to believe this guy was a candidate for bail. He’s a bail jumper, and that right there should have kept him from ever getting bail again. He’s clearly a persistent violent, felony offender, not to mention being a registered sex offender. The D.A. has blood on his hand, and he should be charged as an accessory to Brooks’s crimes.
“ here’s his rap video.”
*************************
If you look at the very end of the video he gives the WHITE POWER SYMBOL.
One of the five victims killed in Sunday’s Christmas parade tragedy has been pictured.
Virginia “Ginny” Sorenson, 79, was described by loved ones as the “beating heart” of the Milwaukee Dancing Grannies.
Her husband of 56 years David Sorenson told the Journal-Sentinel his wife, who had a bad back and dodgy hip, had initially been due to ride the route in a van. But as the grannies were short of numbers for the parade, Ms Sorenson had offered to hold a banner and march with them.
Yes, there was all of these postings coming from his community about Daryll Brooks, which were quite revealing.
They were disappeared without a trace.
Unhinged criminal activity by people who have no concern for anyone enforcing the law is all over the country today.
I’ve lived long enough to know the difference between a law abiding society and one that is not.....the one we’re experiencing now is not and increasingly so, with governing powers encouraging it....as well attempting to disarm the public from defending themselves in the heat of it all.
Try this:
“Rapper MathBoi Fly aka Darrell E. Brooks Jr Arrested Following Waukesha Parade Accident- Who Is He?”
November 22, 2021
ZERO coverage now on MSNBC/CNN. The incident has now been flushed the memory hole. Like it never happened.
Instead, they are covering the Arbery trial and subpoenas for the Jan 6 kangaroo court with a mania that is rather frightening.
Apparently 5 white lives matter much less than 1 black one to the liberal media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.