The shots have an in-sample efficacy rate of 90%+. If people in the high-risk strike zone took shots, that seems eminently reasonable.
I also consider the absence of the usual 2-10 year clinical trial period the FDA requires - what happens if your left ear falls off in year 2.7? - to be a yellow flag, as well as the messenger RNA platform that has never been released on the citizens. Those facts also can be brandished reasonably to not take the shots.
I don't doubt that some people regret taking the shots, just like I don't doubt some people regret NOT taking the shots. Health is a personal matter, and what's good for one person isn't good for someone else.
I object to the force being imposed when the data are so utterly cloudy.
Well said, thank you.
Some of the reports I’m seeing reveal that too many people
are winding up with it, if only 5% are still susceptible.
There are circumstances where most new cases are people who
have had the vaccine.
Something is rotten in Denmark...
I do agree with your post, but that one area seemed reasonable
to mention.