Is it just me or does it seem silly to be scared of something that "killed" two-tenths of a percent of the American population.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
1 in 100 is 1%. 1 in 500 is a 20th of that.
The vaccine is a dead end path to coping with Covid.
Eventually it will not work at all.
Immunity is 27 times more effective than any Vax.
So how do we get immunity? We use drug therapy once infected, and we all sooner or later will be infected, its like the common cold, unavoidable.
The best so far is Ivermectin based drug therapy.
The proper approach to conquering the virus is one like we use for malaria.
Ivermectin therapy should be over the counter, non prescription, and used according to established protocols with which we can educate the public.
If you cannot get a physician’s prescription, you can order it here:( Use Pay Pal)
1) Zivirdo Kit:
https://dir.indiamart.com/search.mp?ss=Zivirdo&prdsrc=1&countryiso=USA
2) Ivermectin Tabs ( get 12 mg tabs)
***************************
Protocols to follow for both Prophylaxis and Therapy for Infection:( read it in detail before ordering)
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf
Ivermectin is no longer a banned treatment by the CDC. They are just “not recommending” it.The reason that the government is so afraid of Ivermectin is that it likely clears the circulation system of ALL stick proteins whether generated by the VAX or by the Virus. So it will likely reverse the effect of the jab.
You will need over the counter Zinc, Vitamin D and Quercetin supplements.Available on line or at larger drug stores.
Hundreds of Feepers stocked up over the last 6 months.
********************************
There is reasonably solid evidence that ivermectin docks to the spike protein itself to prevent binding to the ACE2 receptor which is the primary pathology causing the tissue damage and clots related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this is also an implication that this ability of ivermectin to disable the binding of the Spike protein including the vaccine-produced spike proteins. This binding of ivermectin to disable the spike protein is also preserved even with the newer spike protein mutations, but its activity against the original Wuhan spike protein,(the one vaccines were designed to produce) is fairly well studied at this point.
Abstract:
Background/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2. Materials and Methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study. Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08. Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.
The following video explains the multiple mechanisms of the activity of Ivermectin including the ability of the body to maintain its basic defense of the cell nucleus in preserving the body’s ability to produce antiviral proteins, inhibition of RNA dependant RNA polymerase which inhibits the replication of viral RNA (possibly including that from the mRNA vaccine package), the stat 3 human signaling pathway which inhibits the production of blood clots also possibly mitigating some of the vaccines most dangerous side effects. Also discussed is the inhibition of the CD147 pathway by ivermectin which again may block the clumping of platelets due to spike protein either from the virus or possibly the vaccines.
Note: Ivermectin therapy likley will gradually rid the body of spike proteins altogether, something to remember for those who might have residual side effects from mRNA vaccine.
Huge successes have happened. Here is one:
“HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3995154/posts
Playing with stats. The alarmists are now going to pack a cumulative 2 year death toll into their calculations.
Actually the chances of dying are 50/50. Every day you either live or die.
And my bet is that most of the deaths attributed to CoupFlu are really from something else.
We already know states are goosing the case counts through the roof.
Who’s gonna be terrified of a scamdemic that isn’t dropping people like flies?
In the UK right now, the average age of a CoupFlu vic is three years older than the average lifespan.
The stats are crap. Including the death stats.
Quick way to tell: See if listings on death certificates for dementia and/or failure to thrive are way down for the last couple of years.
Betcha.
Popular Science should bring back Darrell Huff. He could tell them How to Lie With Statistics.
1 in 500 is 1/5 of 1 in 100. 620k deaths out of 330 million is 0.2%, or 1 in 500. The scare-pron doesn’t adjust for age (average age of covid death is ~82, statistically insignificant from normal average age of death). Furthermore, 98% of the deaths are folks over 50 years old and the vast majority of those are 75+.
BS to that “1 in 500” statement. From the start, those stats have included those who died of any cause but happened to have COVID at the time.
Hey, maybe we should treat sick people? Wouldn’t that cut down on deaths? No more telling them to go home until they need help breathing, and then we’ll intubate them, give them damaging Remdesivir (causes kidney damage, cardiac problems). Those who experience the ‘problem’ with Remdesivir (fluid filling the lungs) could avoid having the ventilator rupture their lungs.
Early, safe, effective outpatient treatment instead of waiting them out ,without treatment, and then treating them poorly.
Oh. And Vitamin D3. 25% of fatalities were low on D3. Why not try it? WHY NOT?
“Ivermectin .vs. Covid In A Poor, High-Density State”
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243599
Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dirt poor, wide use of Ivermectin.
Active cases literally less than one-in-a-million.
1 in 100 is 1%. 1 in 500 is a 20th of that.
I wonder what the rate of ‘flu’ deaths is (prior to the plandemic)
It is died “with Covid”, not died of Covid.
_Huge_ difference!
Are those numbers inflated by adding in other causes like flu and motorcycle accidents?
The virus is still largely taking out people who already have other risks.
Die in a motorcycle crash and you too can be a COVID-death.
I believe even that is high. They’ve said Covid for so many deaths of people with other health conditions and such that this number can’t really be believed either. I would go with 1 in 1500 at best.
Now, a couple of things to keep in mind:
The count of COVID “deaths” is incredibly inflated, by both the 94% false positive PCR “test”, and by the absurdly dubious counting being done. But if we apply the 94% false positive alone, we find 680,000 * .06 = 40,800. This number, while still most likely overcounting “COVID deaths”, means that the real number is more like 1 in 8,333 Americans that have “died of COVID” (340,000,000/40,800).
Now take that 40,800, and remove all the people who were needlessly killed by unnecessary sedation and intubation, and those who actually died of something else, and the real number of “COVID deaths” is probably closer to 30,000, at most. Now consider that the CDC claims that there were only something like 1800 cases of influenza last year, and that the average age of people “dying of COVID” is more than 10 years ABOVE average life expectancy (and are therefore not unusual, and are what in the past would have been considered dying of old age), and that 30,000 drops to pretty much zero.
EVERYTHING we’ve been told about “COVID” is a LIE.
And by the way, getting into discussions or arguments as to whether the “vaccines” are effective or not, is pointless, because it allows the false premise that “COVID” poses some existential threat to everyone to be accepted. It should not be.
Missing from this is the % of “covid deaths” who were in the terminal state of life due to underlying health issues
How many of this “1 in 500” number were people all ready dying of other health issues?
Covid is a big killer of people with underlying health issues. It not killing off large numbers of healthy people.
…not discounting all the “…died WITH Covid” deaths.
Fell out of a tree? - Covid.
Electrocuted themself? - Covid!
Drunk driving? - Covid!
Fentanyl overdose? - Covid!!!
https://www.thewanderingrv.com/car-accident-statistics/
Nearly 1.25 million people are killed in car accidents each year. That means, on average, fatal crashes cause 3,287 deaths per day. An additional 20-50 million people are injured or disabled. More than half of all road traffic deaths occur among young adults ages 15-44.