I just heard about a couple that the husband caught it last weekend from someone who was vaxxed, husband is in the hospital, wife at home. Vaxxed person is just now showing symptoms.
Teport is from my son’s college professor (she goes to church with the couple)
************************************************************************************
I believe it. It fits with some of the studies I have looked at. So the injection has worked to reduce the symptoms, and the apparently unintended consequence is that the injected
1. become super spreaders,
2. have delayed treatments-potentially making their illness worse than if treatment began immediately,
3. and are being required to mask up to prevent others from getting the illness - including the other injected people.
In addition, other studies have shown that the existing vaccines are not effective for building durable immunity since the data is that the nucleocapsid section, which the vaccines do not code, is where most of the pre-existing resistance against serious disease resides.
Seems to me, that mRNA wasn’t ready for prime time, and the traditional inactivated virus process would have been better for building durable immunity against the RONA and it’s variants.
My question is....if un-jabbed gets infected by a jabbed person, is that still considered natural immunity (“good”, lifetime immunity)...or, is it some sort of detrimental/non-effective *immunity*? 😱
🤔
I haven’t heard anyone answer this, yet.