Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes; ransomnote; tatown; Ahithophel; metmom

My question is....if un-jabbed gets infected by a jabbed person, is that still considered natural immunity (“good”, lifetime immunity)...or, is it some sort of detrimental/non-effective *immunity*? 😱

🤔

I haven’t heard anyone answer this, yet.


73 posted on 07/29/2021 9:12:43 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Long

that’s an interesting question. I dunno. However, I would think that if the Jabbed are infected, it is with a real virus that they encountered. Therefore, I would theorize that the immunity from surviving would be effective and durable.

Additionally, recall that approximately 80% of people already had some measure of immunity, and if such a person caught a virus no matter who from, it would tune up the natural immunity.

In addition to all the other risks associated with the injection, this ability of the shot to dampen the symptoms, makes the spread more likely-a negative for public health.

And from an individual standpoint that jabbed person is getting delayed treatment because they don’t know they are infected—and we know early treatment is important to their health, as well as to reduce the need for hospitalization.


74 posted on 07/29/2021 9:24:13 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Long

The infection is caused by the virus, so it would produce the same immunity.


75 posted on 07/29/2021 10:07:48 PM PDT by TTFX ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson