JUST NOW
Biden snaps on camera when Peter Doocy calls out his conflicting statementshttps://rumble.com/vki7ff-biden-snaps-on-camera-when-peter-doocy-calls-out-his-conflicting-statements.html
Waiting for liberals to hit social media and start calling them anti-vaxxers.
“The CDC did not answer questions Wednesday about whether it relied on outside sources of data or the number of patients examined in its outbreak investigations.”
Data? They don’t need data.
Data is just justification to the masses for their decisions to lord it over us.
Time to get out and make more shopping trips to prep for the new shutdowns looming.
“They’re making a claim that people with delta who are vaccinated and unvaccinated have similar levels of viral load, but nobody knows what that means,” said Gregg Gonsalves, an associate professor at the Yale School of Public Health. “It’s meaningless unless we see the data.”
—
The missing data means it’s bad and they don’t want to show it. My bet is that vaccinated people are transmitting *more* virus than unvaccinated. An inconvenient truth.
Read an article from some psycho bitch who is the glad the pandemic happened cause she thinks masks “prevent so many other infections” people should wear them forever.
We were warned about the dangers of socialized medicine you we find ourselves here. Thanks to John McCain, Mitch McConell’s little buddy.
How'd you like to lose your funding, and that of everyone in the institution you work for, Professor Expert?
This isn’t anything new. It’s just a repeat of the old asymptomatic spreader narrative again. CDC thinks they have a mandate to protect us all whether we want protection or not.
Data?? We don’ need no stinkin’ DATA!!!
Are the buzzards coming home to roost?
TO BE CLEAR- I am pro-safe and ethical vaccines and vax development x 30+ years.
For preventative vaccines, one must develop, license etc. within a safety/ethics box
But shortcuts have been made with these, and other options deprioritized pic.twitter.com/0ol9iL4f4Z— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 28, 2021
The title overstates my conclusion - vaccine could cause the virus to be more dangerous. The fragments of information being disclosed are consistent with this.https://t.co/I8Z84YnOea— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 28, 2021
Interesting study came out earlier this week.
• Psychologists at the University of Pennsylvania conlcude from a study that trusting science is not enough. Without critical thinking, people who claim to “trust science” can be gullible (J Exp Soc Psych. 2021;96:104184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104184). They ran four experiments (N = 532, N = 472, N = 605, N = 382) with online U.S. samples introduced false claims concerning a (fictional) virus created as a bioweapon, mirroring conspiracy theories about COVID-19, and carcinogenic effects of GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms). Participants who trust science are more likely to believe and disseminate false claims that contain scientific references than false claims that do not. Reminding participants of the value of critical evaluation reduces belief in false claims, whereas reminders of the value of trusting science do not. We conclude that trust in science, although desirable in many ways, makes people vulnerable to pseudoscience.
Per the CDC,”Data? We doan need no stinkin’ data.”
This is series.
According to Dan Crenshaw, the data came from India and was a single paper which FAILED peer review and was based on a vaccine not even available here in the states.