Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victoria’s Secret Cancels Angels, Replaces them with Woke Ideologues
Townhall.com ^ | July 26. 2021 | Dave Seminara

Posted on 07/26/2021 7:43:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Cultural Revolution has claimed some very attractive new scalps. The Victoria’s Secret Angels and the brand’s signature “miracle bras” are history. As The New York Times recently noted, Victoria’s Secret’s parent company, L Brands, was unacceptably “out of step with the broader culture” but is now “trying to redefine what we consider sexy.”

The move comes after 2019 revelations that Leslie H. Wexner, the founder and chairman of L Brands, helped the late child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein meet some of his victims, and presided over what the Grey Lady called “a misogynistic corporate culture that trafficked in sexism, sizeism and ageism.” It also comes as the fat acceptance movement gains currency and at a time when insurgent competitors like Cuup, Skims, Parade and others compete to out-woke each other.

“When the world was changing, we were too slow to respond,” said Martin Waters, who was appointed chief executive of the brand in February. “We needed to stop being about what men want and to be about what women want.”

As the Journal reported in a recent piece on sea changes in women’s intimate apparel, “women young and old” now want “inclusive sizing and non-objectifying advertising imagery featuring a diverse group of models.”

But Victoria Secret’s recent introduction of seven new woke brand ambassador models, called the VS Collective, appears to be more about pushing left-wing politics and checking identity-politics boxes than producing better products. Consider some of VS’s new arrivals. Start with Megan Rapinoe, a soccer star/ left wing activist who kneels during the National Anthem and is described by VS as a “LGBTQIA+ Activist and Pay Equity Crusader.” She told The Times that VS’s old “patriarchal, sexist” marketing was “really harmful” to women.

Then there’s Amanda de Cadenet, who is described as a journalist, but based on her writings and social media posts appears to be more of a professional Kamala Harris cheerleader and Trump hater than anything else. (Come to think of it, perhaps journalist is the correct description given the times.)

After the 2020 election, Cadenet posted on Instagram that she “couldn’t get enough of Kamala Harris.” She also posted a video of someone flying an expletive (f***) Trump flag with the caption, “Pure joy !!!! Seeing so many people joyous, laughing, dancing, celebrating and loving this moment with all their hearts is everything I need today.”

The woke lineup also features a pair of plus size models and fat acceptance advocates. There’s Simon Mariposa, a Los Angeles influencer who wears a size 22-24 and calls herself “superfat,” and Paloma Elsesser, a biracial plus-size model who on Election Day last year posted on Instagram, “sending love to everyone but Trump supporters, (f***) y’all…black, indigenous and POC friends in recovery please don’t hesitate to reach out for meetings and spaces for support.”

Rounding out the collective are a trio of skinny women who are apparently spared the woke guillotine since they satisfy several identity politics boxes. They are Eileen Gu, a 17-year-old freestyle skier who was born and raised in the United States, but became a Chinese citizen in 2019 in order to represent China, Valentina Sampaio, a transgender activist from Brazil, and Adut Akech, a refugee from South Sudan turned model.

If Victoria’s Secret really wanted to go all-in on inclusion, shouldn’t they have models with acne or other skin problems? Why are there no Albinos, no Native Americans, no women in hijabs or burqas, no dwarves, no one with cleft palates, club feet, or other deformities? While we’re at it, how come none of the models are ugly and how long will it be before an ugly acceptance movement takes shape and attractive models become unemployable pariahs?

I’m well aware that some models starve themselves and suffer disproportionately from eating disorders. I don’t prefer the waif look; I like to see women who look healthy. But having sat through countless lectures from leftist public health scolds about “trusting science,” during the pandemic, I wonder why the same people promote morbid obesity as normal given the dire health implications?

American women overtook men in obesity rates in 2015 and, according to the CDC, have a severe obesity rate of 11.5 percent compared to 6.9 percent for men. The New England Journal of Medicine estimates that by 2030, severe obesity will be the most common BMI category at 27.6 percent. Despite this trend, you rarely hear anyone on the left sounding the alarm about these numbers.

Aside from the public health implications, I also resent that another blue-chip American corporation is trying to “redefine” what beauty is while jamming its progressive politics down our throats as an offering to the woke intelligentsia as penance for its founders Epstein-related sins. It’s true that men can be shallow, but studies have shown that women—or should we call them birthing people— can be just as superficial. A 2017 Royal Society study, for example, showed 160 women photos of men with their shirts off. Zero women surveyed showed a preference for weaker men. Other studies have shown women prefer men who are tall and affluent.

Men might moan about these issues, but I don’t expect to see companies scrambling to find pot-bellied men with sunken chests to fill catalogs anytime soon. L Brands doesn’t care what men think of their woke marketing efforts, but I recently visited a VS store at my local mall to see what the changes were all about. There were indeed posters of multiracial plus size women, but a salesperson told me the largest underwear size they carry is XL.

“We can order up to XXL,” she said. “But we don’t carry them in stores.” My visit confirmed what I already suspected: like many other companies, VS’s woke messaging is created for and by guilty, fit, white liberals, rather than people who actually need plus-size underwear.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: kamelfaceharris; victoriassecret; wokeness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Kaslin
“trying to redefine what we consider sexy.”

What you mean "we", Paleface?

21 posted on 07/26/2021 8:06:46 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"... trying to “redefine” what beauty is ..."

...
"There’s Simon Mariposa, a Los Angeles influencer who wears a size 22-24 and calls herself “superfat,”..."


22 posted on 07/26/2021 8:10:11 AM PDT by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

No one in the audience? Must be COVID restrictions.


23 posted on 07/26/2021 8:13:14 AM PDT by alstewartfan (The dawn is turning away The ghost of Charlotte Corday. Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Edward Teach

Victoria’s secret was that she was a ho. But now that being a ho is mainstream it is no longer secret.


24 posted on 07/26/2021 8:24:13 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Play with knives long enough and you will eventually bleed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is of interest to note that the only “female” angels in the Bible are demons . . .


25 posted on 07/26/2021 8:32:37 AM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Only democrats would hate beautiful women.


26 posted on 07/26/2021 8:47:56 AM PDT by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Idiot progressives. They think they can just rewire millions of years of DNA. Yeah. Because everyone want the VS catalog featuring Rosie Odonnel, Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi.

I had to get a nice shirt for an “emergency” business meeting a few weeks ago and target was the only store I could find. So I went in. Every female model on the posters was fat or black and all the men were gay and black. So much diversity.


27 posted on 07/26/2021 8:58:22 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A company has the right to go broke. GM, Coke, Chrysler....and they will do so. Painful for the lowly, but the upper execs do pretty well. Good for the next business that replaces them to satisfy the need the previous company stopped meeting. Good for auctions. Hard on the lowly good worker. Chattel should stop taking duch jobs. This helps the next generation maybe.


28 posted on 07/26/2021 9:10:25 AM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Any postal mail from this company goes straight to the recycle bin.
29 posted on 07/26/2021 9:31:04 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’ll have a talk with my 3 granddaughters who have in the past bought from VS.....a lot of those times I paid for it. They best not do it again.......


30 posted on 07/26/2021 10:11:36 AM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So long Victoria’s Secret!!


31 posted on 07/26/2021 10:17:45 AM PDT by Halls (I’m a Texan and I’m pro life! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
When they started showing their commercials with scantily clad women portraying angels I just thought "Wow, if I had something to do with that I'd hate to face Judgement Day surrounded by real angels while I explained myself!"

I supposed it doesn't matter what they do, it will be hard to explain.
32 posted on 07/26/2021 10:31:39 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Victoria’s Secret’s parent company, L Brands, was unacceptably “out of step with the broader culture” but is now “trying to redefine what we consider sexy.”

Sneak peak at the upcoming fall line:


33 posted on 07/26/2021 10:49:57 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Omgoodness, those hands are such a turn on!


34 posted on 07/26/2021 8:16:08 PM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis deplorable. WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What a great way to kill your brand. This is comparable to replacing Formula 1 racing cars with go carts.

The plain fact of the matter is that sexy lingerie displayed by gorgeous young women is meant for women to entice the men in their lives. After all it is in the privacy of the boudoir that such ... clothing most entices.

35 posted on 07/27/2021 9:49:23 AM PDT by jmacusa (America. Founded by geniuses . Now governed by idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson