TRUMP RESPONDS: ‘Why Even Wait’ To Decertify Arizona, Irregularities Amount To ‘Hundreds Of Thousands Of Votes’

President Donald Trump put out a new statement in response to the damning Maricopa County audit hearing in Arizona earlier today, which revealed shocking voting irregularities and evidence of fraud that have cast further doubts on the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

“Arizona Senate hearings on the Maricopa County Election audit is devastating news to the Radical Left Democrats and the Biden Administration. While this, according to the Senate, is preliminary, with results being announced at a later date, it seems that 74,243 Mail-In Ballots were counted with “no clear record of them being sent.” There were 18,000 voters who were scrubbed from the voter rolls after the election. They also revealed that the voting system was breached or hacked (by who?) Very big printer and ballot problems with different paper used, etc., and MUCH MORE,” wrote President Trump. (READ MORE: BREAKING: Arizona Senator Calls For Recalling Electors After Bombshell Audit Hearing)

“The irregularities revealed at the hearing today amount to hundreds of thousands of votes or, manay times what is necessary for us to have won. Despite these massive numbers, this is the State that Fox News called early for a Biden victory. There was no victory here, or in any other of the Swing States either,” continued President Trump.

“Maricopa County refuses to work together with the Senate and others who are merely looking for honesty, integrity, and transparency. Why do the Commissioners not want to look into this corrupted election? What are they trying to hide? The highly respected State Senator Wendy Rogers said in a tweet the hearing today means we must decertify the election. In any event, the Senate Patriots are moving forward with final results to be announced in the not-too-distant future, but based on today’s hearing, why even wait?” President Trump said. (READ MORE: BOMBSHELL: Over 74,000 Mail-In Ballots Counted With No Record Of Being Sent Out, Verification Process Degraded To Nothing)

The hearing was widely viewed and has attributed to growing accusations that the election was stolen from President Trump. Among many others, Arizona State Rep. and Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem said that the ongoing Arizona election audit confirms that the 2020 presidential election in the state was a “sh*t show” that “cannot be called accurately.” Damning revelations from the hearing include testimony from the private auditing firm Cyber Ninjas, which introduced evidence showing that a “bunch” of Arizona ballots contained duplicated serial numbers, as National File reported.

There is no legal way to undo the election

*****

Really?

So if someone is put into office by using blatant massive vote/voter fraud and it’s proven, they get to stay in office?

You’d think for something as important as the Presidency of the Unite States that should not happen.

So if someone buys a car with counterfeit money or a bad check, do they get to keep it?

You so do know that if Trump won with voter fraud, BLM and antifa would riot, kill people and burn cities down until Trump is thrown out of office, right?

The election was with the electors. Not the vote that selected the electors.

Pence certified the election.

That was it. Game over. No more plays.

Also remember the magic word “standing”. The USSC will just punt this out the door by saying no one has standing.

And finally, we need to realize something very unpleasant.

We, as a nation, have passed the event horizon of when laws matter. Biden threatened to use F15’s and nuke us. The Cali Governor ordered F15’s to buzz protests (thank God the pilots said no).

All this legal gymnastics only matter if people agree to play by the rules. By definition, the people in power are not playing by the rules anymore.

There is one set of laws for an orderly transition of government in a republic, and another for revolution. Revolution is by definition an illegal act since it overthrows a set of laws in favor of another new set of laws.

This ongoing socialist revolution has occurred almost within the laws and the constitution except for the possible fraud aspect, if it can be proven legally that fraud led to the outcome, then the government is illegal under the recognized framework of law and can only maintain its existence by declaring (what is now an unspoken) revolution and winning that revolution.

I won’t need to remind anyone how the United States of America came into existence, as did the French Republic and the Soviet Union. None of those were legal constructs according to monarchs deposed from power (in the American case, only within the territory of the United States, in the other cases, by termination of their rule). Several other examples exist. What they demonstrate is that law is essentially de facto in its primary justification. Whoever actually has power has the ability to define what law is valid.

Right and wrong are moral or ethical questions and there are no final answers on those. Few would say the American Revolution was a bad thing, few would say the Russian Revolution was a good thing, and opinion might be something like 60-40 on the French Revolution. Again, other cases exist and have different historical perceptions, but if you believe in God then only God’s opinion really means much in this complicated question.

So there are no easy ways out, no legal ways to stop an illegal revolution from reaching its ultimate goal other than to fight your way back to the counter-revolutionary position. This is a difficult truth and millions are having problems with it. They look for deliverance from a court system that seems partially co-opted by the revolutionaries and otherwise disinclined to act decisively. Or they look for deliverance from unknown actors (the Q model) who could conceivably have enough power to act. Or they look to God who could theoretically intervene and restore the republic.

A haze has descended on all this because a large part of the population either does not perceive any revolutionary situation underway (just a normal election and transition, the Mitt Romney position), or they want this change (they are socialists/communists) or they are in denial about what is clearly evident.

My belief is that the rest of us who are moderately to extremely concerned about the situation need to hold an urgent congress to work out the best response. We are by definition counter-revolutionaries if we think this government is illegal. But a counter-revolution has rarely succeeded in history (one or two twists or turns in the story of the Roman empire, and the restoration of the British monarchy, are two examples). We need to figure out how to do counter-revolution successfully. Waiting to 2024 and hoping for the best seems like a very improbable way to do counter-revolution but if that is the chosen path, then it needs to be cleared out in advance (the election process needs to be brought under better control).

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

President Donald Trump has issued a new statement in response to the explosive Maricopa audit hearing in Arizona, which revealed voting irregularities amounting to hundreds of thousands of votes.