We all know how it was stolen. We all know GA, MI, PA, AZ, and numerous others, used Dominion to steal the election. Once these audits are finished, the enforcement is the issues...Soros-elected officials oversee challenges and won’t decertify nor enforce overturning...so, where and how can it be done? If PDJT is in charge, “he has everything”...including the routers. We’ll see how it plays out.
There is one set of laws for an orderly transition of government in a republic, and another for revolution. Revolution is by definition an illegal act since it overthrows a set of laws in favor of another new set of laws.
This ongoing socialist revolution has occurred almost within the laws and the constitution except for the possible fraud aspect, if it can be proven legally that fraud led to the outcome, then the government is illegal under the recognized framework of law and can only maintain its existence by declaring (what is now an unspoken) revolution and winning that revolution.
I won’t need to remind anyone how the United States of America came into existence, as did the French Republic and the Soviet Union. None of those were legal constructs according to monarchs deposed from power (in the American case, only within the territory of the United States, in the other cases, by termination of their rule). Several other examples exist. What they demonstrate is that law is essentially de facto in its primary justification. Whoever actually has power has the ability to define what law is valid.
Right and wrong are moral or ethical questions and there are no final answers on those. Few would say the American Revolution was a bad thing, few would say the Russian Revolution was a good thing, and opinion might be something like 60-40 on the French Revolution. Again, other cases exist and have different historical perceptions, but if you believe in God then only God’s opinion really means much in this complicated question.
So there are no easy ways out, no legal ways to stop an illegal revolution from reaching its ultimate goal other than to fight your way back to the counter-revolutionary position. This is a difficult truth and millions are having problems with it. They look for deliverance from a court system that seems partially co-opted by the revolutionaries and otherwise disinclined to act decisively. Or they look for deliverance from unknown actors (the Q model) who could conceivably have enough power to act. Or they look to God who could theoretically intervene and restore the republic.
A haze has descended on all this because a large part of the population either does not perceive any revolutionary situation underway (just a normal election and transition, the Mitt Romney position), or they want this change (they are socialists/communists) or they are in denial about what is clearly evident.
My belief is that the rest of us who are moderately to extremely concerned about the situation need to hold an urgent congress to work out the best response. We are by definition counter-revolutionaries if we think this government is illegal. But a counter-revolution has rarely succeeded in history (one or two twists or turns in the story of the Roman empire, and the restoration of the British monarchy, are two examples). We need to figure out how to do counter-revolution successfully. Waiting to 2024 and hoping for the best seems like a very improbable way to do counter-revolution but if that is the chosen path, then it needs to be cleared out in advance (the election process needs to be brought under better control).