[Menehune56]

These people just can't leave well enough alone. Talk about picking at scabs!

[BenLurkin]

What’s to investigate?

It all came out in the lawsuits.

[smokingfrog]

MAGA Smirk?

He was just trying to maintain a pleasant composure while being harassed by activist kooks.

[cdcdawg]

Nick Sandmann, guilty of the crime of Having a Facial Expression While White.

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

And we thought the “good” people in Salem were nuts with their witch hunting practices.

[ElkGroveDan]

it’s not until 50 minutes into its 87-minute runtime that The Boys in Red Hats gets around to the elephant in the room : the MAGA gear that the Covington kids proudly wore in a show of solidarity with white nationalist sympathizer Donald Trump.

And so ends any credibility this reviewer ever had.

[Williams]

Child abuse.

Yeah investigate a kid’s smile.

[Texas Fossil]

The media lost this one in court but they never give up.

The settlement was huge and Sandmann won bigly.

This article is still more #ComDem_Insanity!

[Captain Jack Aubrey]

An appallingly awful “news” story by Nick Schager.

[rockabyebaby]

HEAR YE, HEAR YE,

No laughing,

No smiling,

No showing your teeth.

[\/\/ayne]

This will make Democrats look even more stupid.

[Rebelbase]

I don’t understand how a Movie Theater would make any money on this film. “Honey, do you want to go see the movie about that MAGA smirk kid?”.

[Robert DeLong]

Perhaps it will be a financial bust. 🙂

[SaxxonWoods]

Just imagine if he had frowned at the drum beater!

[Prov1322]

Quote from this screed...

“The Boys in Red Hats is honest about its biases and intentions while taking an admirably even-handed approach to its subject, and in many respects, it gets at the foundational assumptions and opinions that breed intolerant tribalism, and individuals like Sandmann and his MAGA ilk.”

[Behind Liberal Lines]

I guess the Daily Beast feels like getting sued.

[Kickass Conservative]

Are they comparing Boys in Red Hats to Men in Brown Shirts?

[gunnut]

Love how the article makes mention of how he sued the media but no mention that they settled the cases (Washington Post and CNN).

[KarlInOhio]

From 1984 (the Democrats' instruction manual):

It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself--anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: FACECRIME, it was called.

[mozarky2]

It was rumored at the time that Chief Meth-Mouth claimed he was a recon ranger in the Army, but I think they just mis-heard him when he said he was a freon changer...